WBC Votes Maskaev as Rahman's Next Foe

[TheFairPole]

Yea, listening to you illustrate you have no idea what you're talking about is a blast.

Dude, even Rahman said that fighting too much on the inside was his mistake. If someone disagrees with you then they don't know what the **** the are talking about?!?! This is the answer to all of your problems in life.

[Bozo_no no]

Dude, even Rahman said that fighting too much on the inside was his mistake. If someone disagrees with you then they don't know what the **** the are talking about?!?! This is the answer to all of your problems in life.

And that too much was a tiny fraction of the fight, which you tried to pawn off was his whole fight plan.

He was rarely on the inside, because when he was, he was getting picked apart.

You've said several things in this thread alone that are outright false.

[TheFairPole]

And that too much was a tiny fraction of the fight, which you tried to pawn off was his whole fight plan.

He was rarely on the inside, because when he was, he was getting picked apart.

You've said several things in this thread alone that are outright false.

You being the biggest Klitschko Nut Hugger of all time was not false!

[Bozo_no no]

You being the biggest Klitschko Nut Hugger of all time was not false!

It's statements like that which take you beyond ignorant and make you a joke.

[Nautilus]

I can see why Rahman would want to avenge his loss to Maskaev, but objectivly from a rankings stand point, that was Seven years ago (1999). By that logic people could say Charrles Shufford or Etienne (I know he's in jail) deserve a crack at Brewster.

your logic is flawed, because ... Maskaev is ranked # 1 by the WBC ... and Shufford is where exactly?

[Bozo_no no]

your logic is flawed, because ... Maskaev is ranked # 1 by the WBC ... and Shufford is where exactly?

That ranking is an absoulte joke. Come off it.

[Nautilus]

And that too much was a tiny fraction of the fight, which you tried to pawn off was his whole fight plan.

He was rarely on the inside, because when he was, he was getting picked apart.

You've said several things in this thread alone that are outright false.

I think you exggerate a lot to support your points of view.

[TheFairPole]

It's statements like that which take you beyond ignorant and make you a joke.

You're the one who brought, and always brings Klitschko into this and every thread so don't take your vice grip personality out on me.

[Nautilus]

That ranking is an absoulte joke. Come off it.

joke or not.... they have been there for hundred years

[Bozo_no no]

You're the one who brought, and always brings Klitschko into this and every thread so don't take your vice grip personality out on me.

That's because you're a proven and admitted Nut Hugger. It renders the majority of what you have to say coming from a place of spitefull insecurity.