Comments Thread For: Thurman-Collazo, Harrison-Nelson - July 11 on ESPN

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigjavi973
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2013
    • 24007
    • 759
    • 1,480
    • 1,236,071

    #31
    Thurman KO's Collazo... Don't be surprised if Thurman gets dropped. Good test for Harrison.

    Comment

    • icha
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 9508
      • 328
      • 368
      • 78,629

      #32
      so ESPN trying to keep FNF level...

      Comment

      • big_james10
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 6809
        • 319
        • 39
        • 13,287

        #33
        Originally posted by Greed.
        I agree that this is a terrible mismatch of a fight. However, I have to say that it is no worse than GGG/Munroe Jr. or Alvarez/Kirkland.

        The best decision Collazo ever made was signing with Al Haymon. Collazo is a b-level fighter who is way past his prime, but he is getting fights, he is getting television exposer and he is getting paid well. That wouldn't be happening if he was fighting for Top Rank or GBP.

        Comment

        • DreamerUSA
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 2302
          • 171
          • 40
          • 32,933

          #34
          Originally posted by Fetta
          Better but wouldve got the same crap for it.
          Exactly. The top ten welterweights are all tied up for the most part. So no matter what, he would of just been fighting a guy with a name. If he fought Devon he would get clowned cause Khan just hung an L on him. If it was Berto he would still be cherry picking. So he was going to take **** no matter what if he wanted to stay busy.

          Comment

          • Weebler I
            El Weeblerito I
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 31092
            • 1,459
            • 1,648
            • 54,550

            #35
            Originally posted by The Gambler1981
            I don't think Thurman can quite do what Khan did, I would also hope Collazo would bring it a bit better than he did that night.

            Thurman is a big favorite though, so I can understand not liking it.
            ? Thurman will knock Collazo out.

            Disappointing match-up which you can guarantee Thurman didn't want, I expect he'll complain about it to the media.

            Respect to Collazo though, he called out Thurman way back.

            Comment

            • bigjavi973
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2013
              • 24007
              • 759
              • 1,480
              • 1,236,071

              #36
              Hold up. So some are ok with the Khan-Algieri fight but not the Thurman Collazo fight?

              Comment

              • hhs661
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 6467
                • 409
                • 417
                • 20,927

                #37
                Originally posted by big_james10
                I agree that this is a terrible mismatch of a fight. However, I have to say that it is no worse than GGG/Munroe Jr. or Alvarez/Kirkland.

                The best decision Collazo ever made was signing with Al Haymon. Collazo is a b-level fighter who is way past his prime, but he is getting fights, he is getting television exposer and he is getting paid well. That wouldn't be happening if he was fighting for Top Rank or GBP.
                This matchup isn't even near as bad as those two. I don't think collazo has a chance, but i do like the fact that Thurman's going to be shown on multiple platforms.

                Comment

                • AgainstTheRopes
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2012
                  • 2902
                  • 103
                  • 56
                  • 9,429

                  #38
                  Originally posted by DreamerUSA
                  Exactly. The top ten welterweights are all tied up for the most part. So no matter what, he would of just been fighting a guy with a name. If he fought Devon he would get clowned cause Khan just hung an L on him. If it was Berto he would still be cherry picking. So he was going to take **** no matter what if he wanted to stay busy.
                  Haymon's in a tough spot. he has a limited amount of guys at Welterweight and he needs to match make selectively. Thats why you got Guerrero fighting a scrub so he can look impressive, fight a decent name like Josesito Lopez or Devon Alexander with the winner getting a fight against say Adrien Broner or Maidana.

                  Comment

                  • -DSG-
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 10949
                    • 1,003
                    • 99
                    • 25,679

                    #39
                    Originally posted by bigjavi973
                    Hold up. So some are ok with the Khan-Algieri fight but not the Thurman Collazo fight?
                    Both fights suck just like Brook-Gavin sucks.

                    Comment

                    • FrankieClutch
                      OTSC
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 6084
                      • 177
                      • 396
                      • 26,671

                      #40
                      I'm not a fan of this fight. It feels like a step backwards for Keith, to be honest

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP