Comments Thread For: Froch's Promoter on Status of Andre Ward Rematch

[SugarRaRobinson]

No, just that it will be exciting to see ward in hostile territory.. In Vegas or new York or anywhere else, ward cruises past froch,,, at least in the UK, the atmosphere will be great...

I'm actually a huge UK boxing junkie, and totally prefer their crowds

Ok cool , but hostile territory is one thing , where it becomes problematic is when it gets so hostile that the judges judge in fear instead of judging with impartiality .

[SugarRaRobinson]

I love watching defensive fighters give a master class in stick and move. That's not what I saw in Dirrell. Froch acted with greater intent & tenacity. Don't agree? That's ok, like I've already told you, it's open to interpretation. The majority agree with me though, inc. the judges.

Those judges should be indicted for corruption , along with the judges from the Holyfield/Lewis fight , in addition to the Judges in the Kahn/Peterson fight

[SugarRaRobinson]

Along with Richard Steele for not letting Medrick Taylor continue with 3 seconds left in the fight against Chavez

[Wicky]

Those judges should be indicted for corruption , along with the judges from the Holyfield/Lewis fight , in addition to the Judges in the Kahn/Peterson fight

You're talking ****e. Froch beat Direll now stop crying you ******** idiot.

[SugarRaRobinson]

You're talking ****e. Froch beat Direll now stop crying you ******** idiot.

When the clock strikes 12 I see u like to take the gloves off , lol . I'll admit , after midnight u have some of the toughest fingers I've ever seen !

[Wicky]

When the clock strikes 12 I see u like to take the gloves off , lol . I'll admit , after midnight u have some of the toughest fingers I've ever seen !

Nah man, just really bored of you ****ing on without saying anything new... or interesting. If you believe Dirrell won fine, but he didn't and that's all there is to it.

[SugarRaRobinson]

Nah man, just really bored of you ****ing on without saying anything new... or interesting. If you believe Dirrell won fine, but he didn't and that's all there is to it.

Like u mentioned earlier ; It's open to interpretation ,so if that's the case , then why r u trying to force feed me ur interpretation ? Im already resolved to the concept that u believe Froch won , ok , I get it , have no respect for it, but I get it and have no interest in changing ur mind about it . Good luck with the way u interpret the world hitherto .

[removed]

Haha i cant believe the yanks are STILL crying about Froch-Dirrell.

[kafkod]

While most see Nottingham as tainted after that gangrenous decision , I'll leave it up to Ward to decide whether London is safe or not . Now as far as u advising me to get over the Froch/Dirrell decision , I'd rather not , so why don't u instead get over , me , not getting over it ? And get off my di.k while ur at it .

Why don't you get over me not getting over you not getting over it and get off my d1ck as well.

[slimshandy69]

How do u deserve a decision when u decisively lose every round ? When u say that he failed to impose his will , what exactly do u mean ? Dirrell put on a boxing clinic , he exemplified what the "sweet science" is all about ; stick and move aka hit and don't get hit back . So when u say Dirrell didn't impose will , that's completely baseless because Dirrells will was to hit Froch without getting hit back and that's exactly what he accomplished . Froch is the one who couldn't impose his will because he wasn't able to engage Dirrell at all therefore what he willed to do was completely nullified . WTF are u talking about ?

LMAO at sweet science, if Dirrells sweet science is to fall over, complain, hold and still end up with a bloddied face and froch unmarked then i want a refund on his sweet science.

I was THERE LIVE and gave the fight 4 rounds to froch. As did everyone else.