Comments Thread For: Froch's Promoter on Status of Andre Ward Rematch

[Jc8804]

I thought the negotiations had ended?

WBA ruled that they had 30 days to negotiate from March 1 and then there would be pursebids.

Anyway my guess is that Froch will be elevated to Superchamp while Ward vacates and possibly pursue his chances at LHW.

No ward wants a mega fight with periban
In oak town at 168

[New England]

froch a warrior doe

[CtrlAltDefeat]

Ward afraid of going to UK because of Howard Foster?
Jack Reiss or whatever his name is
the american ref didnt even warn andre about it... but a headbutt as blatant and damaging as the ones we have seen in the kessler fight could argue for a dq or no contest w rematch even with no prior point deduktion
,

FrochWard2 needs to happen in UK and most important froch choose the ref, so ward wont be allowed to bend the rules and prevent any real action from taking place due to him wrestling and grabbing/holding the cobra guns while grabbing 10 times per round
Ducking below the waist and using illegal tactics like leaping headbutts and jabs followed with a duck and rising headbutt into opponents faces

Ward is acting like a spoiled prima donna at the negotiating table, impossible to come to terms with even if everything is logical so even a chicken or monkey would understand why cobra calls the shots, he calls himself SoG..pfff
froch is more SoG than ward ever was

Froch isnt in a hurry..even if they strip him of the title we all know ward will come to uk eventually unless he is too much of an akward coward not to mention ******ed SMH and then froch may beat his ass and take the super 168 title and the belt they stripped to try and force him will mean nothing by then

If it happens on froch terms it will be a win win for everyone
And this time no excuses

In fact If i was Jay Z I would force andre ward to travel
and if he refuses then fire his pompous arrogant ass

Im sure jay z can make so great an offer to carl (and eddie?) that they cant refuse it , and make Froch the number 1 im sure he could Rock the nation to great fortune and make some noise instead of putting it to comalike sleep

[Wicky]

Like u mentioned earlier ; It's open to interpretation ,so if that's the case , then why r u trying to force feed me ur interpretation ? Im already resolved to the concept that u believe Froch won , ok , I get it , have no respect for it, but I get it and have no interest in changing ur mind about it . Good luck with the way u interpret the world hitherto .

It's not what "I believe", it's the recorded result. Meaning it's what happened. Your's is the opinion.

[SugarRaRobinson]

People r so wide open and susceptible to suggestion it's pathetic . When u listen to the commentary of the Ward/Dirrell all they talk about is how close the fight is all throughout the fight and therefore the Froch fans on here feel justified in stating that it was either very close or that Froch won . Compare that to the commentary in the Ward/Froch fight where they are constantly touting Wards prowess over Froch dispite the fact that both fighters were slugging it out (and Ward was getting hit alot) unmercifully, with Ward getting the best of most of those exchanges . My point is this ; Dirrell beat Froch more decisively than Ward did because of how he fought Froch , but he has little to no constituency and therefore his commentary was bias so most Froch fans just fall in line with the commentary and claim the fight was either close or that Froch who .

[SugarRaRobinson]

Or that Froch won *

[Wicky]

People r so wide open and susceptible to suggestion it's pathetic . When u listen to the commentary of the Ward/Dirrell all they talk about is how close the fight is all throughout the fight and therefore the Froch fans on here feel justified in stating that it was either very close or that Froch won . Compare that to the commentary in the Ward/Froch fight where they are constantly touting Wards prowess over Froch dispite the fact that both fighters were slugging it out (and Ward was getting hit alot) unmercifully, with Ward getting the best of most of those exchanges . My point is this ; Dirrell beat Froch more decisively than Ward did because of how he fought Froch , but he has little to no constituency and therefore his commentary was bias so most Froch fans just fall in line with the commentary and claim the fight was either close or that Froch who .

It's a boxing match. Both people get hit, that's the way it works. Ward was dominant, Dirrell wasn't. No amount of crying will change that.

[SugarRaRobinson]

But for u Morons who think that Froch won or that it was even close , here u go

!Carl Froch
Total punches thrown-613
Total punches landed-.....39

Andre Dirrell
Total Punches thrown-539
Total punches landed-"280"!!!

Total Connect percentage
Dirrell-52%
Froch- .....6%

Jabs Thrown
Dirrell-298
Froch-324

Jabs Landed
Dirrell-"142"
Froch-26

Jabs connect percentage
Dirrell-48%
Froch-8%

Power shots thrown
Dirrell-241
Froch-289

Power shots landed
Dirrell-"138"
Froch-13

Power shots connect percentage
Dirrell-"57%"
Froch-4%

[SugarRaRobinson]

It's a boxing match. Both people get hit, that's the way it works. Ward was dominant, Dirrell wasn't. No amount of crying will change that.

We will let these REAL FIGHT STATS tell the real story . Clearly if u think ur right because ur on the side of the judges decision , then ur simply siding with ******ity or either racist favortism

[Wicky]

We will let these REAL FIGHT STATS tell the real story . Clearly if u think ur right because ur on the side of the judges decision , then ur simply siding with ******ity or either racist favortism

I'm not evening going to check your homework little man, but I will say stat's are only part of the equation. That's why we have judges instead of machines. Froch, aggressor not very effective / Dirrell, defensive not very effective. The aggressor wins.

Racist? That's quite a big leap. Not very bright.