Froch stripped of WBA title?
Collapse
-
Froch's legacy is already set in stone. Nothing he does from here on out will have any effect on it. He wants to have a fight in Vegas where he has never fought before and to go out in style with a great weekend party. He's earned it.Comment
-
Is that guy credible? If so that ends this madness. Froch doesn't want the fight and it shouldn't be surprising because he's said it before.@Woodsy1069 wba saying froch is stripped because he won***39;t negotiate for that fight, so looks unlikely. Sturm v chudinov for wba regular.
— Gerry Murray (@gerryjmurray) April 2, 2015
Comment
-
If Froch gets stripped while Ward gets to keep his belt, it's an injustice. Ward has been inactive for two years.
The WBA never forced Sturm to fight Golovkin, and will never have a purse bid for Braehmer to fight GGG. They seem to keep changing their own rules.Comment
-
It's easy to say something to the press, man. Leo Santa Cruz is willing to fight the world if you listen to his public statements. Both fighters have publicly said they want the fight but I can guarantee you that neither of them really do.Comment
-
Ward has been inactive for 16 months. Froch has been inactive for 11 months. Ward has the real belt. The WBA stripped the right guy, Carl the Cowardly Cobra Froch.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment