Cotto Rips GGG's Resume
Collapse
-
-
I sensed zero fear from Cotto when he mentioned GGG and the hype surrounding GGG. I sincerely believe Cotto does not buy the hype. I did sense a businessman thinking in terms of $$$ and at this stage in his career, there is no shame in the cash out sweepstakes.Comment
-
The only problem would be you hating for no reason. Your answer is basically saying I know what your thinking, when I don't... Cotto's first option for the belt wasn't Heiland or K9 it was Floyd. His backup was Canelo, they didn't work out so now he's looking at some other options, so yeah, I don't see a problem. Never said they were good fights, but it's the best option he has.Comment
-
True. They mentioned GGG in a certain light, and Cotto was simply letting them know his view on GGG and his resume. Done in a very matter of fact way and providing perspective from an actual fighter.
Canelo gonna get it next.Comment
-
The only problem would be you hating for no reason. Your answer is basically saying I know what your thinking, when I don't... Cotto's first option for the belt wasn't Heiland or K9 it was Floyd. His backup was Canelo, they didn't work out so now he's looking at some other options, so yeah, I don't see a problem. Never said they were good fights, but it's the best option he has.Comment
-
Comment
-
nothing compared to what your trying to make it sound like.
again, I will be doing a translation in a bit.Comment
-
Cotto is not the central issue the fact that he is the lineal MW champion is. The status needs to be defended against worthy challengers who fans want to see or be vacated in a timely manner. If not this becomes less of a sport and more a business/entertainment venture.Comment
-
Perhaps, but for Cotto, there are still some questions about GGG. Can't fault Cotto for providing HIS opinion on GGG. There is some truth to what Cotto mentioned about GGG's opponents. I guess Cotto is harder to impress than most fans.Comment
-
slightly better... simply due to Money being on his...Last edited by PR ESQ.; 03-27-2015, 10:56 AM.Comment
Comment