There was no offer. So basically you two rushed to attack Wilder at the first chance you got, for no real reason.
I could understand if this was just a principle that you happen to feel very strongly about and that you always defend passionately regardless of a boxer's nationality. But you can't point me to any threads where you are opening your mouths as loudly in criticism of Euro boxers for doing the same thing. So I have to assume that your motivations here aren't exactly about the principle.
You defended it man! Doesn't matter if it was hypothetical or not.
To me it doesn't matter who is being most biased. It matters who is winning the debate and to me it's clear the pro-wilder vs povetkin proponents are getting their wig pushed back.
To me it doesn't matter who is being most biased. It matters who is winning the debate and to me it's clear the pro-wilder vs povetkin proponents are getting their wig pushed back.
It cannot be denied.
It's as simple as that.
The fact that you have to keep re-iterating that in every post and sucking off anyone who agrees with you whilst writing "/Thread" every two seconds shows who's really winning this debate.
lmao wilder ****s "I knew it was a fake offer all along!"
Lets be honest you hope he never fights again because the second he loses that paper belt you have to force yourselves to hate/ignore the hevayweight division again and go back to worshiping Floyd. Options are getting thin.
To me it doesn't matter who is being most biased. It matters who is winning the debate and to me it's clear the pro-wilder vs povetkin proponents are getting their wig pushed back.
Comment