i want stevenson to ko kovalev to see how the boxing world reacts to it lol..he says he wants the fight right now and thats a start..im also interested to see how kov can perform with a real lhw that isnt 50..both gys have crazy **** so cant wait to see it
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Trainer: Kovalev is Not on GGG's Level
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostWhy should fights be fought at catchweights? There are weight classes for a reason. And there are enough weight classes already without people inventing new ones.
Asking for pathetic catchweights is b*tch **** but I understand why you have to defend them. :*******:
If a CW is required in order for a fight to be made, if it's a big fight, I'm all for it. Crap like Danny Garcia fighting Salka is a farce and that's horrible for boxing. Kovalev is way too big for GGG, I doubt that fight ever gets made, but there is no need to dismiss it so quickly. It doesn't need to happen right away, if at all. So yes, I'll defend catch-weights since that's what you're accusing me of. I'm down for Mayweather/Canelo, Pacquaio/Cotto and every other massive and/or big fight that was made because they needed to agree on a weight. I guess you prefer we had more May/Pac situations of fights not being made for dumb**** reasons like 1 pound too much or too little.Last edited by Beater_of_ass; 11-18-2014, 12:13 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View PostCatchweights have been going on since boxing began, it really is nothing new. Many fights were made because they were at a catch-weight, they are more of a good thing than a bad thing. Do I like them? No. Can I stop them? No. So why are we going to get upset over catch-weights? If you had your way nearly no great fights in history would be made, what a great thing for boxing that would be right?
If a CW is required in order for a fight to be made, if it's a big fight, I'm all for it. Crap like Danny Garcia fighting Salka is a farce and that's horrible for boxing. Kovalev is way too big for GGG, I doubt that fight ever gets made, but there is no need to dismiss it so quickly. It doesn't need to happen right away, if at all. So yes, I'll defend catch-weights since that's what you're accusing me of. I'm down for Mayweather/Canelo, Pacquaio/Cotto and every other massive and/or big fight that was made because they needed to agree on a weight. I guess you prefer we had more May/Pac situations of fights not being made for dumb**** reasons like 1 pound too much or too little.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostThey clearly didn't seem interested one way or another.
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View PostCatchweights have been going on since boxing began, it really is nothing new. Many fights were made because they were at a catch-weight, they are more of a good thing than a bad thing. Do I like them? No. Can I stop them? No. So why are we going to get upset over catch-weights? If you had your way nearly no great fights in history would be made, what a great thing for boxing that would be right?
If a CW is required in order for a fight to be made, if it's a big fight, I'm all for it. Crap like Danny Garcia fighting Salka is a farce and that's horrible for boxing. Kovalev is way too big for GGG, I doubt that fight ever gets made, but there is no need to dismiss it so quickly. It doesn't need to happen right away, if at all. So yes, I'll defend catch-weights since that's what you're accusing me of. I'm down for Mayweather/Canelo, Pacquaio/Cotto and every other massive and/or big fight that was made because they needed to agree on a weight. I guess you prefer we had more May/Pac situations of fights not being made for dumb**** reasons like 1 pound too much or too little.
No one dismissed anything. Kovalev is far too big to be moving down in weight so if anyone wants to fight him, they had to come to his weight class. It's that simple and it's in no way a b1tch move.
Comment
Comment