Comments Thread For: Kovalev's Trainer Explains How to Beat Floyd Mayweather

[El-blanco]

Your IQ must be lower than double digits because I asked only about the tactics suggested. Instead of answering, you brought up a whole host of other things.

He pointed out the hypocrisy of morons like you complaining about someone using dirty tactics against Floyd because he employs many himself. Obviously he was right about what he said regarding I.q because it flew over your head.

[The Big Dunn]

He pointed out the hypocrisy of morons like you complaining about someone using dirty tactics against Floyd because he employs many himself. Obviously he was right about what he said regarding I.q because it flew over your head.

No it didn't, I just asked for an answer to the question. A yes or no would have sufficed. the other stuff really had no bearing on the answer.

The thread is about the specific tactics suggested, not if Floyd or BHop has ever thrown an elbow and how his fans react to it.

[elishua F]

I completely agree with ur post up until the GOAT portion haha. Floyd definately has the tools for a GOAT candidate..Canelo was a good win. Maidana was ok considering he had that strap, floyd very well could have unified with porter who had a very solid win at 147 in devon. P4p porter would have been a better win than maidan who beat broner who just jump 2 weight classes, could have evn fought him on sept bcuz he was coming off stopping malinaggi, maidan rematch wasnt needed floyd won 8-4..and now khans next, p4p brook is a more solid fight and he has that strap..khan altho "fast doe" has been knocked off his perch spmetime ago..wouldnt you expect a GOAT candidate to fight the best available opponent?

Name any other boxer in history that in order to beat him people were advised to be flagrantly dirty. Floyd is the G.O.A.T, of course that's just my opinion, don't take it personal.

As far as Porter, what makes you think people will give Floyd credit for that when he doesn't get credit for beating Canelo. And beating Paulie shouldn't make Porter a monster.. also I believe Khan has the only style out there that can give Floyd the most trouble. . The win vs Collazo was solid, I actually picked Collazo to KO him.. and if Khan puts on a similar show vs Devon, he not only deserves the Floyd shot, he earns it. Porter would just try the same old "be dirty" gameplan and get picked apart, Khan brings more tools. The height, speed, jabs, combos, footwork, i would love to see how Floyd handles that.

[Ray*]

I think a number of people have already tried this. From Corley-Hatton-Ortiz-Maidana.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Maidana tried that dirtiness and he only managed to win 3-4 rounds. This happened with Weeks who did a horrible job of officiating, who not only acknowledged this himself but also admitted he should have taken away a point. It's gonna take someone who focuses on the body and can counter off the back foot, one who is two handed, that's Thurman for me. Thurman likely isn't gonna get the opportunity but I like his chances better than anyone else at the moment.

[Caught Square]

Easier said than done.

[wlliam]

Just throwing it out there...I'd take John David Jackson's word on how to beat mayweather over a bunch of floydiot computards. You guys are ridiculous.

.truth

[radioraheem]

Exactly, I have no problems with either. I am pro-PEDs and pro-everything goes. I know it sounds wrong but I'm on the mentality that it's your life or mine in that ring. I would love if it was a battle to the death like the Roman era.

You are so crazy.

Just leave boxing alone and go watch MMA or something.

[wlliam]

Name any other boxer in history that in order to beat him people were advised to be flagrantly dirty. Floyd is the G.O.A.T, of course that's just my opinion, don't take it personal.

As far as Porter, what makes you think people will give Floyd credit for that when he doesn't get credit for beating Canelo. And beating Paulie shouldn't make Porter a monster.. also I believe Khan has the only style out there that can give Floyd the most trouble. . The win vs Collazo was solid, I actually picked Collazo to KO him.. and if Khan puts on a similar show vs Devon, he not only deserves the Floyd shot, he earns it. Porter would just try the same old "be dirty" gameplan and get picked apart, Khan brings more tools. The height, speed, jabs, combos, footwork, i would love to see how Floyd handles that.

Maidana beat broner, porter beat alexander, who had the more solid win? Khan/alexander, brook over porter..which would be a more solid win? P4p who is more solid? I dont care o much about marketability bcuz for your sake floyd will still get his 32mil so you shud still be able to get some sleep at night

[Willthethrill]

So you're gonna act as if Bradley is NOT tailored made for Floyd.. the guy prides himself on taking a beating with his massive robocop head, defensive skills are mediocre, and has conditioning issues.. Floyd would beat the breaks off Timmy.. Stylistically the only guy not tailored for Floyd is Khan due to height, jab and speed.

I don't think Tim would beat floyd, but Tim is a versatile fighter, I'm sure he would be intelligent vs floyd