Originally posted by kafkod
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joe Calzaghe: Hopkins in a Dangerous, Difficult Fight
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postit's not that lacy was terrible it was that he was unproven. he beat 1 guy in the top 10(rated #8) and looked mediocre against guys like vanderpool, wigins, and sheika. there was no reason to consider him as a good fighter. its not like he was golovking who has destroyed 5 top 10 fighters yet calzaghe fans act like calzaghe beating lacy was a great win. it was not. lacy was schooled by jermain taylor lol
I stand by what I said. Until Calzaghe schooled him Lacey was viewed by most boxing pundits the same way GGG is viewed today - unproven, but clearly the best man in his division and feared by the other belt-holders.Last edited by kafkod; 10-31-2014, 09:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostEvery time I visit this site I see posts saying exactly the same thing about GGG as you just said about Lacey - he's unproven, he's never beaten an elite level fighter etc, etc.
I stand by what I said. Until Calzaghe schooled him Lacey was viewed by most boxing pundits the same way GGG is viewed today - unproven, but clearly the best man in his division and feared by the other belt-holders.
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postyes he bossed the fight by following hopkins around, missing his punches, and running into counters lol. how is it easy to score a fight for the guy not landing and getting countered? because he was trying hard isn't a legit reason.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostLacy was over rated and nowhere near the status of Golvkin at the same time , its like Algieri , as soon as he is fighting Manny the pac fans up his rating 10 fold , it was the same with Lacy the Cal fans pump his tyres up , it makes the wins look better , just the way fans of the winner like it .
Comment
-
-
One will need lots of speed, volume punching, angles and defense in order to defeat Bernard Hopkins. So far no one dimensional fighter with offensive firepower has had any success against him in the past and that list includes: Trinidad, Pavlik and Cloud.
Bernard is very difficult to overwhelm or overpower with power punches because they are easier to defend against because they are coming at him at a much slower pace. His subtle movements and tucked chin makes it extremely hard for punches to land flush on him. Thereby, neutralizing his opponents greatest assets by virtually rendering them impotent against him.
In my judgement, Adonis Stevenson would have been a much better competitor against Hopkins than Kovalev, because he is not only the more technically sound fighter but the more versatile and diverse of the two also.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Foreign Soil View PostIn a fight where hardly anything happens, you have to go with the guy with ring generalship. Hopkins was backed into the ropes all night via Calzaghe's generalship and eventually needed to fake a foul to catch a breather. Hopkins didn't counter the entire fight, he only did so effectively in a couple of rounds.Last edited by daggum; 11-01-2014, 02:56 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostEvery time I visit this site I see posts saying exactly the same thing about GGG as you just said about Lacey - he's unproven, he's never beaten an elite level fighter etc, etc.
I stand by what I said. Until Calzaghe schooled him Lacey was viewed by most boxing pundits the same way GGG is viewed today - unproven, but clearly the best man in his division and feared by the other belt-holders.
Comment
Comment