Is Froch an ATG
Collapse
-
to consider him an atg is degrading to fighters who have racked up more quality wins than froch has...like hearns
I rank him over calzaghe as he has simply faced and mostly beaten better quality opposition, but his claim as a unified champion is ridiculous as he beat kessler who basically got the "regular" belt handed to him
I also don't consider his best win, kessler, to be relevant as a post ward kessler simply wasn't the same fighter, and pascal his second best win was a novice fighter at that time
had froch beaten stevenson when he was willing to move back down after the dawson fight I'd rate froch as highly as wardComment
-
Comment
-
... Carl Froch will be remembered as one of the best British fighters.Comment
-
Ward is no.2 P4P and one of the most highly regarded in the sport of recent times. Froch is his best win, without him his resume would be just pretty good. Admit it guys. So if Ward is rated so highly off the back of Froch then why are people (especially Ward fans I suspect) d*cking on him?
advence edit: Weight drained zombie dieing life support Dawson was not a better winComment
-
Light heavy is one of the deepest divisions in history. It has a deep talent pool and is filled with some of the greatest fighters to even lace them up. Needless to say Froch wouldn't compare favorablyComment
Comment