Originally posted by Luilun
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Should Gennady Golovkin be in the top 10 P4P?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Foreign Soil View PostLol Dirrell's pedigree. He's done at the top level. Froch isn't doing anything with GGG, he won't even get in the ring with him.
Not even close froch is proven and fought the best in a deep division not a mediocre one like 160 not much depth
Pedigree in the ams and pros
He has fought fighters of different styles and classes...Carl froch and Abraham are much better than rubio, Macklin, and geale he also beat Stevens first... He has world class experience like GGG in the am pros...you know pedigree lol
Comment
-
The hypetrain side of my brain says yes the merit measuring side of my brain says no. Let merit win out the day this time.
Comment
-
I haven't given much thought to it, but I don't think I'd have a problem having him around 9 or 10. It has to be stated that his resume is absolutely woeful, and I'd never normally consider someone with such a resume in the top 10.
It also has to be stated that GGG fanboys are making it really hard to root for him. It's ridiculous.
Comment
-
P4P is supposed to be about who you think RIGHT now would win if everybody was the same weight.
People seemed to have lost track of that these days and think it is just a compare boxrec resume competition.
No way are there ten guys out there that would be backed to beat GGG if you shrunk or increased them to 160.
(This is why Rigo even more so than GGG should be way, way, way up the p4p lists btw)
Comment
-
Originally posted by House of Stone View PostP4P is supposed to be about who you think RIGHT now would win if everybody was the same weight.
People seemed to have lost track of that these days and think it is just a compare boxrec resume competition.
No way are there ten guys out there that would be backed to beat GGG if you shrunk or increased them to 160.
(This is why Rigo even more so than GGG should be way, way, way up the p4p lists btw)
Comment
Comment