[IMG]http://***ishcurrents.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/joe-louis-primo-carnera.png[/IMG]
Why is Joe Louis Rated so Highly?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
-
Its telling you pick a fight featuring an older louis fighting a fighter who bears no resemblance to Wlad.
At least pick a fight where he fights a bigger fighter who primarily boxes from from the outside behind a jab like Wlad does
Comment
-
I never said he was the smallest. He was one of the smallest. I never said he was one of the worst either (?)He wasn't the smallest and by no means was he one of the worst despite your thoughts about weight and significance.
There's no question that Byrd is one of Wlad's best wins. Also, so is Haye another guy who's not a natural heavy and was a 178 pounder in the unpaid ranks when Wlad was a 245 pound heavyweight. Chambers is also just a lazy heavyweight.
Hell, Brewster could easily shed 25 lbs if he actually decided to give a shyt and not let his diet consist of burgers and fries.
Anyways, I don't really know why I'm getting drawn into this mess as you and I both know you've never watched a full joe louis fight. You're boxrec fan and that's another fact.
Byrd was one of WK's 10 best but not a top 5.
Chambers is an expertly skilled boxer, very fast and slick.
And you mean THIS David Haye?
http://www.goldenboypromotions.com/i...-hayemaker.jpg
Yeah he'd be shivering in his pants against park bench and newspaper type opponents such as Louis and co. I can see him really struggling with Schmelling and Galento.
Why would Brewster want to shed 25lbs? At 225 at which he fought Wlad, he had a ****ing 6 pack!
You will never find any boxer of the 1930's that had a 6 pack!
If the boxer has a 6 pack, he is neither fat, OR lazy!
Seen lots of Louis and lots of all the boxers in question. And that's how exactly I can declare with confidence, that this myth.. Is completely and utterly busted!
Comment
-
Yeah.
I remember a video posted on here where someone took Vitali Klitschko fights and made them all grainy, I figured I'd Google search to see if I could find it quick. Ended up on probably the most disturbing site I've ever seen, with a thread called "N****** Getting Their Asses Kicked." Lots of Klitschko love for beating up Shannon Briggs in there.
I should not have Google searched Vitali Klitschko Grainy Video.Comment
-

This guy^^^
What a ****in idiot.
So you pick a much MORE bummy opponent against an even more primer Louis which STILL looks like rubbish?
Leave you alone and you'll destroy your own argument.
Louis might do good in ammy boxing today but Primo.. the only place for him is the circus!Comment
-
But Ross Purrity would have been world champion in those days
This guy^^^
What a ****in idiot.
So you pick a much MORE bummy opponent against an even more primer Louis which STILL looks like rubbish?
Leave you alone and you'll destroy your own argument.
Louis might do good in ammy boxing today but Primo.. the only place for him is the circus!
Comment
-
What're you on about you absolute fool!??Yeah.
I remember a video posted on here where someone took Vitali Klitschko fights and made them all grainy, I figured I'd Google search to see if I could find it quick. Ended up on probably the most disturbing site I've ever seen, with a thread called "N****** Getting Their Asses Kicked." Lots of Klitschko love for beating up Shannon Briggs in there.
I should not have Google searched Vitali Klitschko Grainy Video.
What relevance does any of this have?Comment
-
Once again. Ross Puritty is a bummy boxer. But he is still more skilful than Primo, as well as being...
1/ More powerful
2/ More experienced
3/ Stronger
4/ Fitter
5/ Tougher.. MUCH Tougher!
Than Primo.
I would bet comfortably on Ross Puritty to beat Primo Carnera, Joe Louis, Joe Walcott and ALL of that eras boxers.Comment

Comment