What makes Kovalev special?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #81
    Originally posted by Foreign Soil
    Develop from the beginning... it's obvious he would need more... Floyd's competition wasn't good early on, it was Broner like.. let's not pretend he was stopping good fighters or anything. If all Floyd had was pressure, he wouldn't even be talked about because he isn't particularly good at it.
    I can't even take you seriously. Floyd competition wasn't good early on?

    Daniel Geale is the **** doe

    Kovalev and Golvkin will need more when they start facing fighters who actually hit back.

    Comment

    • Foreign Soil
      First Time Skeptic
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2013
      • 5249
      • 194
      • 219
      • 11,783

      #82
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      I can't even take you seriously. Floyd competition wasn't good early on?

      Daniel Geale is the **** doe

      Kovalev and Golvkin will need more when they start facing fighters who actually hit back.
      The featherweights Floyd fought were nothing near special, if you say otherwise you're overrating them. Corrales and then at lightweight with Castillo were exceptions, - looked great against Corrales, but struggled with Castillo twice. What's the point? Floyd isn't great at fighting forward, he's just not natural at it or else he'd "Gatti" everyone, especially since he cherry picks. Having power isn't a "skill" but being able to land it does take skill, obviously..

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #83
        Originally posted by Foreign Soil
        The featherweights Floyd fought were nothing near special, if you say otherwise you're overrating them. Corrales and then at lightweight with Castillo were exceptions, - looked great against Corrales, but struggled with Castillo twice. What's the point? Floyd isn't great at fighting forward, he's just not natural at it or else he'd "Gatti" everyone, especially since he cherry picks. Having power isn't a "skill" but being able to land it does take skill, obviously..
        Painful reading. The irony is just too much....

        Comment

        • Foreign Soil
          First Time Skeptic
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2013
          • 5249
          • 194
          • 219
          • 11,783

          #84
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          Painful reading. The irony is just too much....
          The irony gets thicker every time you post.

          Comment

          • SlySlickSmooth
            SWIFT
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2012
            • 12735
            • 421
            • 291
            • 26,153

            #85
            Using Broner logic.

            "Sugar Ray killed a man, and Kovalev killed a man. So that means Kovalev is the closest thing to Sugar Ray Robinson!"

            Comment

            • Citizen Koba
              Deplorable Peacenik
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2013
              • 20457
              • 3,951
              • 3,801
              • 2,875,273

              #86
              Originally posted by From Russia
              so why 2 fighters with same weight and hand speed have absolutely different punching power? Because one of them knows how to shift his weight and has better coordination, and you can work and improve those things...
              Perhaps call it a talent, something in part natural attribute, but capable of being improved by practice and training.

              Comment

              • E. O. Wilson
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jul 2014
                • 555
                • 61
                • 56
                • 726

                #87
                It could also just be style/strategy. Not every guy with a light touch simply can't punch talent wise. A lot of trainers just prioritize touching then covering and moving over following through with every punch.

                Almost every punch Kovalev throws seems intent on causing damage, so on one hand if he starts landing opponents basically melt in front of him but if he doesn't, he could be pretty vulnerable to a dirty/counter boxer. Makes the Hopkins fight interesting.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 49445
                  • 5,022
                  • 269
                  • 104,043

                  #88
                  Originally posted by Foreign Soil
                  Develop from the beginning... it's obvious he would need more... Floyd's competition wasn't good early on, it was Broner like.. let's not pretend he was stopping good fighters or anything. If all Floyd had was pressure, he wouldn't even be talked about because he isn't particularly good at it.
                  Complete nonsense.

                  Floyds competition was very good early on.

                  Hernandez
                  C.Hernandez
                  Corrales
                  Manfredy
                  Chavez
                  Castillo x2

                  Stopped all but Castillo and C.Hernandez.

                  All top level and ranked fighters

                  Broner like?

                  Comment

                  • Foreign Soil
                    First Time Skeptic
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 5249
                    • 194
                    • 219
                    • 11,783

                    #89
                    Corrales n Castillo >>> than the rest. The others were solid level fighters but lets not act like they were anything more, and Floyd was bigger than most(the Broner correlation).

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 49445
                      • 5,022
                      • 269
                      • 104,043

                      #90
                      Originally posted by Foreign Soil
                      Corrales n Castillo >>> than the rest. The others were solid level fighters but lets not act like they were anything more, and Floyd was bigger than most(the Broner correlation).
                      Well yeah they were better because they were elite level.

                      All the others were top level fighters and top ranked fighters and he wasn't bigger than all of the either.

                      The Broner "correlation" is ******ed and their isn't any correlation.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP