Cotto vs Lara

[Bardock]

My bad guys, I forgot to feed my banana rat. It gets a little crazy if I don't feed it. I apologize!

Lmao oooooohh killll Emm

[Black Barty]

First of all Canelo beat Lara and you're just mad because you support every black boxer over being a fan for a genuine specific reason.

Race is as good a reason as any to support a fighter. You can support anyone you want for any reason, as long as you are not delusional and obnoxious about it.

The problem isn't that he supports Lara because Lara is black. It's that he thinks Lara got "robbed".

[$Bullsfam$]

Cotto can't handle slick boxers? Wtf is that? Because he lost to Floyd?

Because Trout isn't slick. He outworked Cotto. Cotto is a better pressure fighter then Canelo. Notice how he did better against younger Floyd then Canelo.

Cotto could beat lara. Lara has no workrate. Some of you are trippin thinking Cotto isn't as good as Canelo or Molina.

[icha]

Funny you mention this given that MOST feel Lara beat Canelo.

As for Cotto v Lara.... it be a HulvaFight!

i havent seen any poll yet where most people feels lara beat canelo, including the two in this forum...
but whatever makes you happy...

[HEND]

First of all, Lara beat Canelo and got robbed. 2nd of all, Cotto can't handle slick boxers. If cotto couldn't beat trout, what makes anyone think he could beat Lara.

Cotto stands no chance against Lara.

First of all there weren't any kind of robbery, Lara was just to inactive in the ring and Canelo beat him on point in a tight fight. MOst of the people gave Canelo the W, and almost everyone agrees that the fight was close, except the biased Lara fans, who don't just claim that Lara won (that could be okay, if you have that opinion) but they mention robbery in a case of a close fight.
Stop being sour g****. Canelo beat in a close fight Lara and Trout too. Robberies are usually the fights when one of the fighters was convincingly better than the other, without a doubt and still didn't get the win but the Canelo-Lara fight was a close fight which could goes either way, but no way that it was so convincing Lara W that you can claim robbery. In fact the majority of people saw it as a tight Canelo win. How can you describe it after that as a robbery? Sorry but I feel a little sour g**** here... Lara was good in the first three rounds but after that Canelo changed his tactic he became more agressive and he outworked Lara in most of the remaining rounds and Lara couldn't change anything significally in his tactic so he collected a rightful defeat. That's all.
BUt Lara is a very bad, sour g**** loser and he thinks about himself that he is a super ww Rigo but he is not even close to that.

[Greed.]

I'd give Lara the edge in a competitive yet clear 8-4 type of decision.
Cotto cuts the ring off better than Canelo but he is smaller and I doubt he punches as hard.

[STREET CLEANER]

Look at what Trout did and Lara is a so much better boxer than him

[radioraheem]

Cotto can't handle slick boxers? Wtf is that? Because he lost to Floyd?

Because Trout isn't slick. He outworked Cotto. Cotto is a better pressure fighter then Canelo. Notice how he did better against younger Floyd then Canelo.

Cotto could beat lara. Lara has no workrate. Some of you are trippin thinking Cotto isn't as good as Canelo or Molina.

I think Cotto would make the fight a little more exciting and interesting than Canelo did. But it'll still be a nightmare type of fight because of Lara's style. Lara is less exciting and back pedals even more than Trout.

[-Antonio-]

The only thing Trout and Lara have in common are that they are southpaws. I really don't get the comparison. It's like comparing Cotto and Canelo. Trout out worked Cotto and mixed up his jab and body punches. Lara is a 1-2 fighter who moves well.

If anything Cotto is better equipped to handle a guy like Lara.

[BendOver]

a majority of the people that watched the fight scored it for Canelo…we're all fanboys

Yes we are and you know it, the fight was close not because ginger but because Laras the only significant punch canelo landed was in the 7, I do understand that you will like to penalized lara for not engaging enough, I did, but at the end of the day you have to land, canelo didn't do that he just followed lara and in a few intances he looked clueless, he will get hit clean every time the Cuban threw the 1-2 and even in the rare occasion he threw the third one, I'm ok with the 115-113 scores but the martinez one was a little too much, I was happy he didn't get the W but anyone happy because ginger got that w is a fan-boy, I was intrigued by canelo didn't like the way he was brought up, the kid has shown willingness to fight the best but I think he will think twice about fighting another boxer, money wise he is already a succeful story, legacy, he have a long, long way to go...