Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

who is the number 1 super middleweight in the word-FROCH OR WARD

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by New England View Post
    "i don't actually follow boxing, so i find those that do intimidating."


    froch will not "fight anybody." he is ducking golovkin and ward. he has said so himself. i don't blame him. ward whitewashes him worst than the first fight, and golovkin ends his freaking career. golovkin might even end his life. this is boxing. you can die in there.


    brits rail the prince for not going to 175, yet froch recieves zero heat for it. he's praised for fighting fringe contenders at best, while ward is crucified for the same tier of fighter.


    andre ward has no fanboys. we're just a loosely assembled crew of boxing afficionados who know a great boxer when we see one. we're scrappy underdogs. a dog loves a bone. there's nothing i can do to make me stop loving great fighters.

    carl froch is very good
    andre ward is great.

    there's a huge difference between the two.
    i agree with most of that, but ward isnt great. i cant say froch is very good either because his skill set isnt the best. froch is a will over skill type fighter. ward has a better boxing brain than froch. however the people that rate ward number 2 p4p are fcuking crazy.
    Last edited by shade darkar; 08-06-2014, 10:40 AM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by New England View Post
      "i don't actually follow boxing, so i find those that do intimidating."


      froch will not "fight anybody." he is ducking golovkin and ward. he has said so himself. i don't blame him. ward whitewashes him worst than the first fight, and golovkin ends his freaking career. golovkin might even end his life. this is boxing. you can die in there.


      brits rail the prince for not going to 175, yet froch recieves zero heat for it. he's praised for fighting fringe contenders at best, while ward is crucified for the same tier of fighter.


      andre ward has no fanboys. we're just a loosely assembled crew of boxing afficionados who know a great boxer when we see one. we're scrappy underdogs. a dog loves a bone. there's nothing i can do to make me stop loving great fighters.

      carl froch is very good
      andre ward is great.

      there's a huge difference between the two.
      Come on NE, there's riling up the Brits and then there's flat out making stuff up.

      Froch is not ducking Golovkin, and he isn't asked to move up because he barely weighs the LHW limit on fight night.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
        Huh? what is this lately with using the completely unable to prove theory of "they will miss him when he's gone"? When did Carl Froch transcend the sport such that his leaving will register?
        You can't forget the "eye test".

        Eye test >>> Resume

        Comment


        • Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
          What are you then?

          Andre Ward might have great skills, but as soon as he's gone not many will miss him. They'll miss Froch.

          And that's the main difference.


          who do you think i wanted to win in the first fight, froch or ward?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by slimshandy69 View Post
            No froch does not refuse a rematch, ward will simply not comeover to the UK.

            Froch fought him in America, has two belts, has justed generated 22 million. Froch ducks no one, you should know this by now.

            Rodriguez is no where near Bute, kessler, or groves, you know this as well.

            But most importantly, there in NO other sport that would tolerate this inactivy and keep your number 1 ranking.

            From Ronnie Osullivan, to Tiger woods etc, when a sportsman is inactive for what ever reason they drop out the top ten and have to work there way up.

            Ward is not clocking up the ranking points to be number 1...


            Lets be honest. Rankings mean nothing. Its about the money the fighter generates. Froch would get paid more from HBO if he fought then Ward would. Until Froch rectifies his loss to Ward, Ward will always be touted as better, even though froch has the better resume..

            Comment


            • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
              Huh? what is this lately with using the completely unable to prove theory of "they will miss him when he's gone"? When did Carl Froch transcend the sport such that his leaving will register?
              When he went straight to war with everyone he faced and gave the world some memorable fights?

              It could be his willingness to fight the #1 guy coming off a defeat to a guy who chose not to fight that guy, or when he went around the world fighting everyone that wanted it.

              Maybe you won't miss him, but Froch sold more tickets in his last fight than Ward has in his entire career - which should tell you something about the interest.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by New England View Post
                who do you think i wanted to win in the first fight, froch or ward?
                Ward obviously, but you will probably say Froch since you're asking that way.

                And why, if I may ask?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                  Come on NE, there's riling up the Brits and then there's flat out making stuff up.

                  Froch is not ducking Golovkin, and he isn't asked to move up because he barely weighs the LHW limit on fight night.


                  let's say, hypothetically, that you're right.


                  does froch not lose to gennadyvich?



                  and he's blatantly ducking the prince. he has no interest in that fight.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by New England View Post
                    let's say, hypothetically, that you're right.


                    does froch not lose to gennadyvich?



                    and he's blatantly ducking the prince. he has no interest in that fight.
                    Because he has better options.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by New England View Post
                      let's say, hypothetically, that you're right.


                      does froch not lose to gennadyvich?



                      and he's blatantly ducking the prince. he has no interest in that fight.
                      Maybe. I don't think it's the foregone conclusion you believe it is. I'd favor Golovkin.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP