Comments Thread For: Khan: If Brook Beats Porter, He Lands in The Big Time

[thack]

Instead of feeding your horrible little ego any further I'll step away from this ridiculous argument with my dignity intact.

I can send you Haroon's number if you still want to hook up...

I think the only person 'obsessed with Khan for years' is you my friend.

You have a lot of repressed anger and frustration about Amir , take a deep breath, exhale very slowly and smile. It works, believe me.

You make sense...Khan NEEDS to fight a top welter...before be GIVEN a title shot...period!

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Rematch with Senchenkho maybe.

Carson Jones trilogy?

[Box-Office]

Carson Jones trilogy?

I saw LacedUp's post and went to the next page only to see if somebody beat me to the Jones trilogy suggestion.

[Box-Office]

Right now, in August 2014 Khan needs Brook a lot more than Brook needs Khan.

If (and that is a big IF) Brook beats Porter, then I think Brook has options that don't necessarily include Khan.

If Brook loses then there will still be interest in the UK for a non-title fight which would be a very decent payday for both fighters.

Khan needs to shut up, fight better opponents and be more active with his schedule.

If he stopped talking all the time he would be forgotten already.

You are quite oblivious to the fact how big financially the Khan-Brook fight with a belt on the line would be in UK. Tell me an another fight that makes Brook tons of $?

Sadly, for you and people like you Brook is actually targeting Khan as we speak. The fight has been brewing for years and domestic fights in UK are very well received.

http://www.boxingscene.com/brook-winning-ibf-title-khan-fight-100-happen--80185

http://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-brook-beats-porter-pressure-on-khan--79576

http://www.boxingscene.com/brook-porter-khan-able-run-no-more--79741

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

Brook is already a bigger name than Thurman . Thurman is a nobody.

Brook is not a bigger name than Thurman. Hardly anybody brings up his name while Thurman's name is brought up on both Showtime and ESPN. Thurman is in no way a "nobody".

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Brook is not a bigger name than Thurman. Hardly anybody brings up his name while Thurman's name is brought up on both Showtime and ESPN. Thurman is in no way a "nobody".

Khan vs Brook or Khan vs Thurman....which is the bigger fight?

[boxingfan1986]

brook v khan in the UK will be big.
in the US, not so much.

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

That's Thurman's problem. It's nobody's duty to try to make that kid relevant.

Brook vs Khan is a fight that could do ridiculous business. Like I said, if you can't comprehend that, then I can't help you.

So it's Thurman's problem that nobody has enough guts to fight him? You're talking about what other boxers gain when fighting, well...what about what Thurman gains? He could gain a lot from beating a big name but they have to get in the ring with him first.

Khan vs Brook or Khan vs Thurman....which is the bigger fight?

Khan vs. Thurman...unless you're talking about in the UK.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

So it's Thurman's problem that nobody has enough guts to fight him? You're talking about what other boxers gain when fighting, well...what about what Thurman gains? He could gain a lot from beating a big name but they have to get in the ring with him first.



Khan vs. Thurman...unless you're talking about in the UK.

Well where else would Brook and Khan fight?

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

Well where else would Brook and Khan fight?

Well, then why even make that comparison?