Comments Thread For: Khan: If Brook Beats Porter, He Lands in The Big Time

[bigjer88]

Khan oh Khan

For the 10,000,000th time, who cares what Khan says?

[Yaconcha]

i dont believe kell will give the greedy boy a chance, boots on the other foot then and he will see how king khunt likes it. deservedly so i think. lol
kell will do mandatories or face a more challenging opponent and guess what?
it aint khan and why? BECAUSE HES A LOSER WHO HAS A LARGE MOUTH AND NO CHIN.
also, he wuld have to prove his worth and fight his way back up the ladder before earninga shot at a "world champion", total ****.

[Bushbaby]

Man, if Brook beats Porter Khan better turn tail and run.

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

Why would he fight Porter if Porter loses to Brook?

And Brook would be the one with the belt and it would be the biggest fight out there for Khan so why would he fight belt-less no names like Alexander or Thurman?

Do you really want to be still wondering for the next 4 or 5 months why Thurman "hasn't fought anybody"? It's because of stuff like that. You have to look at what Thurman gains and not just at what the champ gains. Besides, Brook's name wouldn't be any bigger than Thurman's even if he does beat Porter.

[Heavyfist]

I dunno, I'm not sold on Porter yet. Maybe I'm wrong, but he's a small dude at 5'5. And he's wild. Brook can be beaten, he's very strong, but pretty slow, and has little head movement. But, I don't think Porter has the style to beat Brook. Hope I'm wrong.

The bookies are heavily favoring Porter.

[fatmackdachamp]

Because it's the biggest fight out there for Brook

da hell wit khan if brook win then it will be tmt vs matchroom mayweather vs brook degale vs love rose vs smith bey jr vs burns quigg vs santa cruz to name a few

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Do you really want to be still wondering for the next 4 or 5 months why Thurman "hasn't fought anybody"? It's because of stuff like that. You have to look at what Thurman gains and not just at what the champ gains. Besides, Brook's name wouldn't be any bigger than Thurman's even if he does beat Porter.

That's Thurman's problem. It's nobody's duty to try to make that kid relevant.

Brook vs Khan is a fight that could do ridiculous business. Like I said, if you can't comprehend that, then I can't help you.

da hell wit khan if brook win then it will be tmt vs matchroom mayweather vs brook degale vs love rose vs smith bey jr vs burns quigg vs santa cruz to name a few

I guess your old accounts got banned

[Box-Office]

Well if you haven't been living under a rock you'd know Kell himself is targeting Khan, so your little fantasy of Brook giving Khan the finger is just that.

I know it is hard for some of you to get over that the chinny guy who was supposed to be done after Prescott has come this far that you have people trying to win a belt just to get in the ring with him. It's not me who is saying it have a read:

http://www.boxingscene.com/brook-winning-ibf-title-khan-fight-100-happen--80185

http://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-brook-beats-porter-pressure-on-khan--79576

Here ya go

[Box-Office]

For the 10,000,000th time, who cares what Khan says?

You only have 99 posts.

[Showtime..]

If you're too spasticated to understand the magnitude of a Khan-Brook fight with a belt on the line in the UK, then I can't help your feeble mind any further.

And the winner gets Hatton'd by Mayweather or Pacquiao.