Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[Weltschmerz]

Scored it very similar but different rounds...I know one thing as long as the likes of laced up is on the other side of the debate that's always a positive without question!

I must say I found it difficult to score upon reviewing. I didn't score it live but felt Fury won. So many rounds were close and could go either way depending on the eye, really. But Fury did win, this is what everybody should agree on. I think a rematch could be much better. Vlad is forced to be more aggressive if he wants a different outcome.

[LacedUp]

:

oh look the pretzel twister strikes again...7 rnds fury /5 Wlad and 1 even is my own score.Yes you are still the imbecile im afraid.lets not confuse who scored it 11 rounds to 1?you stated fury won by 8 rnds by the judges,that contradicts your own score correct?



Sportsmail's Jeff Powell scored the fight 115 to 113 for the new champion



"LACED" up......

Dude - The judges had him winning 8 rounds on two cards and 9 on one card. No one had Fury winning only 7 rounds. You obviously just don't understand what a point deduction is or how to score it it seems.

I for sure scored it 11-1 Fury.

If you would care to tell me how Wlad won his rounds, I'd be very interested.

[Elroy1]

There is no point in arguing this with LAced Up. He will blatantly refuse to accept a respectable scorecard in favour of promoting a Wladimir thrashing.

He talks of Fury doing to Wlad what Wlad did to most of his opponents, totally shut them out.

Obviously this wasn't the case at all.

It seems it is not good enough that Fury won, but the insults have to rain down to make it worthwhile.

[Drunken Cat]

I checked my posts, and I actually scored it 116-111 live (I wrote 117-111, but I think I forgot to deduct the point).

The first round could have gone either way though.

There might have been another close round or two in there.

I thought Fury clearly won though.

[LacedUp]

If Wlad had done what Fury did, the same lemmings would have been here talking about how Wlad schooled the number one contender in the world and won every round.

guaranteed.

[LoadedWraps]

:

oh look the pretzel twister strikes again...7 rnds fury /5 Wlad and 1 even is my own score.Yes you are still the imbecile im afraid.lets not confuse who scored it 11 rounds to 1?you stated fury won by 8 rnds by the judges,that contradicts your own score correct?



Sportsmail's Jeff Powell scored the fight 115 to 113 for the new champion



"LACED" up......

The fight was 13 rounds?

[Elroy1]

If Wlad had done what Fury did, the same lemmings would have been here talking about how Wlad schooled the number one contender in the world and won every round.

guaranteed.

Yeah because I'm ALWAYS trashing Wlad's opponents post-fight aren't I?

I'm always saying how the guy was a useless opponent.

In fact, I'm always defending the fallen opponent claiming that it is in fact Wlad that makes them SEEM bad because he is so good.

So why the hell would anybody diss Fury had he in fact LOST a close fight with Wlad?

Anybody testing Wlad at all, even at 40, deserves massive credit!

[removed]

:

oh look the pretzel twister strikes again...7 rnds fury /5 Wlad and 1 even is my own score.Yes you are still the imbecile im afraid.lets not confuse who scored it 11 rounds to 1?you stated fury won by 8 rnds by the judges,that contradicts your own score correct?



Sportsmail's Jeff Powell scored the fight 115 to 113 for the new champion



"LACED" up......

You have to remember that the mainstream media and Klittards like Weltz are completely biased against Tyson Fury. They're desperate to see him lose. Any boxing fan with two eyes would struggle to give Wladimir more than 2 rounds.

[LacedUp]

Yeah because I'm ALWAYS trashing Wlad's opponents post-fight aren't I?

I'm always saying how the guy was a useless opponent.

In fact, I'm always defending the fallen opponent claiming that it is in fact Wlad that makes them SEEM bad because he is so good.

So why the hell would anybody diss Fury had he in fact LOST a close fight with Wlad?

Anybody testing Wlad at all, even at 40, deserves massive credit!

So why have you kept going on about his age and talking about Wlad being poor and he'd win in a rematch?

Hardly sign of "massive credit".

[Elroy1]

So why have you kept going on about his age and talking about Wlad being poor and he'd win in a rematch?

Hardly sign of "massive credit".

WHY the Sam hell do the two have to be mutually exclusive in your head??

OF COURSE he was poor!

But OF COURSE it's a great achievement DESPITE SO!

We are talking about Wladimir bloody Klitschko here...

The problem with you here is that you never accepted the PRIOR truth.. That he went 22 fights/11 years as champ undefeated and virtually invincible in the heftiest AND highest quality era of HW boxing there has ever been.

And then along came Fury who upset him.

Tyson Fury has just upset the most evidence-based wise invincible champion in boxing history.

Even if he IS shot, to be the one to topple the mountain writes him in the history books forever!

But the fact remains that it was a poor Wlad and there's good chance he will win a rematch, JUST SAYING!

There is no disrespect intended toward Fury.

THIS time around, I declare there is about as much chance of Fury winning! Which is a FAR cry from beforehand when I figured Fury couldn't win and probably not even survive.

I don't think anybody counted on Wlad being THAT bad.