Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[Burt Saxby]

Well that makes Fury an excellent name on Vlad's resume then, so win-win.

Then there will be no excuses when Wlad looks like dump against Fury.

[Weltschmerz]

Then there will be no excuses when Wlad looks like dump against Fury.

He usually looks better against tall fighters, I think it'll be a great fight as long as it lasts for Fury.

[Burt Saxby]

He usually looks better against tall fighters, I think it'll be a great fight as long as it lasts for Fury.

So it takes utter bums like Mariuz Wach to make Wlad look good?

This theory stemmed from the Wach fight.

I thought Wlad is a master of controlling range and distance, so how come he cannot shine against smaller guys with his size advantage?

Size is an advantage for every fighter but its not for Wlad?

Maybe Wlad just isn't as good as you think he is.

[Szef]

Then there will be no excuses when Wlad looks like dump against Fury.

I see.

So unless Wlad destroys Fury in couple of rounds without getting punched himself, you'll still come here and critize Klitschko like a pathetic little hater that you are

Even if he whitewashes Fury, you'll probably still show up just to menstruate about something



Just go away.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Well that makes Fury an excellent name on Vlad's resume then, so win-win.

The beauty of this fight is it silences even more critics who who have built Fury up to be this all conquering behemoth. I think I may start playing along with the notion Fury is in fact a potential all time greatest who can go on to unify the division, even with his apparent lack of one punch fight ending power, experience against top echelon fighters and general intelligence.

Maybe Wlad just isn't as good as you think he is.

Or he is just better than you can bare to accept. Don't worry, in 3-4 years he will retire and you will be able to sleep throughout the night without waking. Just hang in there buddy, we are rooting for you.

[LacedUp]

Tony Thompson iced Price- who at one stage was deemed to be the same level as Fury.

All Fury has done to prove otherwise is beat up on Chisora!

Thompson's record is approximately 5x better quality than that of Tyson Fury.

Just pull it up. Note the losses to Pulev and Takam were DECISION losses and also rather close fights at that!!

In fact, only Klitschko has DECISIVELY defeated him!!

Tony Thompson is a prime candidate for the best HW boxer in history never to win a HW title, basically unzipping his fly and taking a long hard piss on your beloved Ron Lyle!! Which brings up another point that the only reason you support Fury is that he is basically a giant Irish Ali clone! (Except with an obviously better defense).

Thompson is far more technically correct and sharp than scrappy Fury.

As you've said in the prior post which contained a lot of ground giving by the way (credit where it's due), one of your main reasons for promoting Fury is his size.

That was against Chambers. Against Thompson he would not enjoy that much of a size advantage at all.

Chisora was higher ranked than Price and was simply also a better fighter.

TT as I said, is a good journyman level fighter. Nothing more, nothing less. Other than Price, he has approximately zero impressive wins.

He is not better than Fury in any way shape or form.

[Redd Foxx]

Chambers got shut completely out by Fury every time they sparred. He admitted this himself.
You're in here claiming to know more about Chambers than Chambers knows about himself.
Highlighting Chambers credentials like that just makes Fury look better.

You don't really know what you're talking about do you?

Did you seriously just make a comparison based on what happened in sparring?? Do you have any idea what sparring is about our what goes on? If two cars attempt to stay at 30mph and one passes the other does that give ANY indication that it's a faster car at top speed? No, it means that one guy is showing less control.

Some of you Fury fans have heads full of fantasy.

[LacedUp]

Well that makes Fury an excellent name on Vlad's resume then, so win-win.

Yes it does.

I don't know why we are even discussing this. I think Fury will provide the toughest test (on paper) since Haye and also the toughest fight for Wlad potentially since Peter.

I think it's a massive feather in Wlads cap if he beats Fury impressively at the age of 39.

[Weltschmerz]

Yes it does.

I don't know why we are even discussing this. I think Fury will provide the toughest test (on paper) since Haye and also the toughest fight for Wlad potentially since Peter.

I think it's a massive feather in Wlads cap if he beats Fury impressively at the age of 39.

Agreed 100 percent.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Agreed 100 percent.

Notice how he gives himself room for retraction , 'if he beats him impressively'.

Pulev is a level above Fury, also been fighting above the level Fury has beem fighting at and yet these losers can't credit Wlad for ko'ing Pulev.you really believe credit will be dispensed when Wlad destroys Fury ? No, me neither.