Cotto's win over Martinez lets rank it

[Larry the boss]

Is it better then Floyds over Mosley??
Is it better then Cotto's over Mosley's?
Is it better then Tito's over Whitaker?
Was it better then Oscars over Chavez?

In my opinion all htese are solid wins, but on this forum certain fights get discedited while others are praised... Ya'll discredit Calzaghes wins over Roy and Hopkins but praise Cottos over Martinez...Please explain and please no name calling of flaming

[bopbopbbe]

I put it around Calzaghes win over Eubank.

[jas]

no its not, sergio is shot, fighters show signs of getting old in sparring in training camp and sergio didnt even spar

[Doctor_Tenma]

It's a very difficult win to rate, I'll leave it as a solid victory. Cotto's win over Mosley is better, not even debatable.

[jas]

I put it around Calzaghes win over Eubank.

great analogy

[Szef]

I rank it right under Floyd's win over Guerrero and his draw against Maidana.

[White_Knight]

The same as Holmes win over Ali.

[-PBP-]

Tough question.

What's funny is an old past prime fighter has nothing to lose. If he wins he's legendary if he loses he's shot. Lol

[bopbopbbe]

Tough question.

What's funny is an old past prime fighter has nothing to lose. If he wins he's legendary if he loses he's shot. Lol

The problem was Martinez not only is old and past prime, he was freaking injured.

Murray beating Martinez is a case of an old past prime fighter losing, not Cotto.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

Cotto did great, but Martinez definitely showed he is much less than his best anymore. On paper its a great win for Cotto, but in reality, its no where near his best win. The HBO guys are really good at making you think Cotto is sensational now with Roach.