Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Haymon to give up rights on certain fighters to free D1ck Schaefer?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by arraamis View Post
    I noticed that quite a few guys are mentioning\tweeting the so-called "no-compete clause" -- Has anyone (Media\news etc..) actually verified\confirmed that one actually exists between GBP & Schaeffer??

    California no-compete clause enforcement

    "With Limited Exceptions, Non-Compete Clauses Are Not Enforceable in California"

    http://ymsllp.com/news-and-publicati...in-california/

    That limited exception is a shareholder leaving the company

    Comment


    • #92
      PBP - your posts in this thread may have even passed your breakdown of stevenson's duck of kovalev

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by PBP View Post
        That limited exception is a shareholder leaving the company
        Thx! Was wondering about that clause, especially with Scheffer holding on to his GBP shares.

        Comment


        • #94
          Such a rat Richard and haymon are, pure thieves

          Oscar should tell them to gtfo

          Richard needs to die

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by PBP View Post
            This is true. But Oscar can't move forward without going for their heads. He has like 2 or 3 marketable fighters under contract right now. Any settlement won't be favorable to him.

            He needs to put his celebrity lawyer to work and go after their asses.
            If both parties knows Oscar has a case, both parties would be interested in settling out of court.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
              Such a rat Richard and haymon are, pure thieves

              Oscar should tell them to gtfo

              Richard needs to die
              By the looks of it Schaefer double-crossed Oscar but the real problem is Haymon, he's a sneak with ulterior motives.

              Comment


              • #97
                I hope the person who advised there should be a "non compete" clause in Schaefer's contract is getting a huge bonus from Oscar this month.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                  If both parties knows Oscar has a case, both parties would be interested in settling out of court.
                  Not necessarily, my friend.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Assuming that Oscar is the one that Espinoza aligns with, it doesnt really matter if he has those guys under contract or not. If he (Oscar) controls all the Showtime dates, then those fighters will either have to officially sign with him, or at least give him options, or they might not be getting on Showtime. I doubt Arum would put Porter, Thurman, etc on HBO unless he was getting options too, so they wouldnt really have much choice.......

                    It will be interesting to see who blinks first......
                    Last edited by OnePunch; 06-05-2014, 01:47 PM.

                    Comment


                    • GbP can continue to make shows with or without TR. Even if theyre stuck in a legal battle. Cant say the same for **** and Co. They arent licensed and will be held up. So I think the one the benefits from a "quick" process is ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP