Who has faced better competition? Broner or Golovkin?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #61
    GGG has wins over Dirrell, Bute, Lee, Macklin, Stevens, etc.

    Broner has lost to Maidana, and robbed the much smaller Ponce de Leon. He's never beaten a good prime fighter.

    Comment

    • Xi_
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 3957
      • 194
      • 6
      • 13,179

      #62
      Originally posted by vman075
      I am not a GGG-tard, the problem with you is you spin the stuff I say or you can't read. You said Broner is fighting top 10 guys. I said fighting a top 10 guy means **** when your division isn't deep then I gave the example that supported how misleading top 10 can be by saying GGG beat two top 10 guys (Macklin and Stevens) and how bad they were. Yet you spin it to make it seem like I'm saying how good his opposition is.

      Adama is not good but your bringing up Golovkins last fight, when Broner fought a guy who is even worse. You say Broners was a confidence builder but he fought on HBO PPV where Golovkin fought a stay busy out of the country not even on American television. Who exactly did you want him to fight in those circumstances?

      Also Demarco sucks, I don't get why this guy is all of a sudden getting so much praise on this thread
      Adama is a cab driver....the fact that GGG fought him is a disgrace, so much so that hbo said **** you we're not televising that BS! he could have went up in weight or down in weight and fought better opposition. you said malinaggi wasn't good but isn't that the same guy everyone is giving porter credit for beating? molina has fought tougher guys than adama.....GGG resume is not better than broner's and i'm not even sold on him being the better overall fighter.

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #63
        Originally posted by Freedom2014
        GGG has wins over Dirrell, Bute, Lee, Macklin, Stevens, etc.

        Broner has lost to Maidana, and robbed the much smaller Ponce de Leon. He's never beaten a good prime fighter.
        He did not face Bute, nor Dirrell in the pro's, damn can we please just keep it real?

        Comment

        • Xi_
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 3957
          • 194
          • 6
          • 13,179

          #64
          Originally posted by Mr.Fantastic
          I see your logic but Golovkin is a beast cause he goes for the kill. He has a high KO percentage and has KO'd the majority of his last 10 opponents.

          Broner on the other hand, talks so much game but rarely produces. He talks as if he's the next Mayweather and such, which he's not. That is why people call him a hype job as well as other things.

          He hasn't really fought that much good comp(Broner). People are basing it off Maidana kicking his ass.
          GGG is a hypejob based on what fans believe......most people don't think broner is the next mayweather. they think he is a clown, having said that he's still got the better resume and face better fighters than GGG.

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851

            #65
            Originally posted by LarryXXX
            He did not face Bute, nor Dirrell in the pro's, damn can we please just keep it real?
            Before he turned pro, Golovkin faced and beat all the top amateurs. He won several Gold medals, including one at light welterweight in 2000, and Olympic Silver at middleweight in 2004.

            Before he turned pro, Broner was beating up and robbing old ladies.

            Comment

            • Fetta
              nob cheese
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 16696
              • 417
              • 3
              • 24,315

              #66
              Originally posted by Freedom2014
              Before he turned pro, Golovkin faced and beat all the top amateurs. He won several Gold medals, including one at light welterweight in 2000, and Olympic Silver at middleweight in 2004.

              Before he turned pro, Broner was beating up and robbing old ladies.
              Shimming has several Gold medals

              Wilder has a bronze medal and is undefeated with a 100% KO ratio

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #67
                Originally posted by Freedom2014
                Before he turned pro, Golovkin faced and beat all the top amateurs. He won several Gold medals, including one at light welterweight in 2000, and Olympic Silver at middleweight in 2004.

                Before he turned pro, Broner was beating up and robbing old ladies.
                When you get done with all that we are talking professional wins.. who has Golovkin beaten as a pro?? how many current world champions?

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 49583
                  • 5,045
                  • 270
                  • 104,043

                  #68
                  Originally posted by brick wall
                  i'm not contesting that broner has a better resume but it's not that much like you claimed. what he has over golovkin was his wins against demarco and malignaggi that's it. losing to maidana diminished his resume whether you like it or not.
                  How does a loss, to a top fighter no less, "diminish" your resume?

                  I thought Loss's were ok. Now one loss dimishes a fighters resume?
                  Last edited by IronDanHamza; 05-23-2014, 01:57 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Fetta
                    Shimming has several Gold medals

                    Wilder has a bronze medal and is undefeated with a 100% KO ratio
                    Yep according to Tunney they are great fighters

                    Comment

                    • tyshun30
                      Banned
                      • May 2012
                      • 1173
                      • 64
                      • 21
                      • 1,363

                      #70
                      Broner it is not even close

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP