Who has faced better competition? Broner or Golovkin?

[Larry the boss]

vote and discuss

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Broner because he's an overhyped fighter who certain people thought was going to be the next boxer of the decade.

People see weakness in him plus a nice paycheque so they are quicker to face him.

[MBE]

Interesting point you are attempting to make (broner has the better resume) but unfortunately leads to an unbalanced analysis. Other questions need to be asked if you want to make a fair comparison of these two:

Who has had the most difficulty against mediocre competition?
Who has demonstrated superior skill and future potential?

These questions amongst others lead to the conclusion that Golovkin is the superior fighter.

[sugarsmosley]

who has a nicer smile, broner or golovkin????

[jas]

[Ivansmamma]

Golovkin hasen't fought anyone at Maidanas level.

If Golovkin fought Kessler or Froch and got abused then he would be an equal hypejob to Broner.

[DeadLikeMe]

Interesting redirect.

[brick wall]

of course golovkin...he beat both dirrel and bute

[Fetta]

Broner but hate clouds these type of debates

[SnakeVen0m]

of course golovkin...he beat both dirrel and bute

AM records don't count in the pro's though.