who did JULIO CHAVEZ beat that was any good?

[JoartCC]

Quit ducking the question jagoff.

Actually, ask yourself that question.

When did you start ******* off?

[SAN D13GO VILLAN]

Actually, ask yourself that question.

When did you start ******* off?

Come on man!! your would doing real good on your debate now your talking dumb ****. what were trying to ask is how old were you because you said you started watching chavez fight at his 50th fight and that happen around the late 80's. Point blank man your going by some articles that you read not fights you seen yourself.

[SAN D13GO VILLAN]

The way I look at it you cant put down a boxer or call him a bum unless you for reals seen his fights **** what the next man has to say seeing is beleaving.

[SAN D13GO VILLAN]

Tell me what you think of this joartcc i'm pretty sure you didnt see all of his fights after his 50th fight but you have to remember he cleaned up all the divisions he was in and allways tried to unify the titles so what else do you want! and what elites are you talking about De la hoya and kotszy? he was way pass his prime back then. The taylor fight I could agree but then he got him in the rematch the randal's fight were both pretty close and the whitaker I could agree also but look at the way he fought him whitaker fought chavez like they were in the Olympics, He wanted the W and run out the building wit it. you know what I mean?

[{BrownBomber}]

Check out the record on Chavez
>http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=008119 . Note how bad
his early foes were.

Check out the records of the early foes of Henry Armstrong:




http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?t=s&sid=13233&m=1&f=b&v=1.4&c=...


Or Jack Dempsey:


http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?t=s&sid=13233&m=1&f=b&v=1.4&c=...


Or Willie Pep:


http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?t=s&sid=13233&m=1&f=b&v=1.4&c=...


Or Archie Moore:


http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?t=s&sid=13233&m=1&f=b&v=1.4&c=...


Or Roberto Duran:


http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?t=s&sid=13233&m=1&f=b&v=1.4&c=...
Yet no one would deny that any of them were great. Fighting bums on
the way up is part of boxing.Matter a fact Chavez has fought the most #1 contenders,champions or ex-champs ever asides those bums.

[Manny_P]

We are not hating dude. That's different from presenting arguments. Hating is when you call a person a chicken and yet you don't present arguments to back it up.

I don't hate Chavez but the fact is, he got his bloated record fighting bums. And we all know what we call a fighter who fights bums on a constant basis. A bum himself.

When it was high time to deliver against elites, he got beat. The rationale is really simple if you take a look at it. An elite beats other elites in convincing fashion. Not lose to them.

Chavez's record is ONE OF THE MOST padded of all time.

[MetalVomit]

Chavez's record is ONE OF THE MOST padded of all time.

One of the best as well.

[IwatchBoxing]

One of the best as well.

What makes his record one of the best? Camacho fought everyone he did, except Whitaker, and more.

[SAN D13GO VILLAN]

What makes his record one of the best? Camacho fought everyone he did, except Whitaker, and more.

Please dont compare camach to chavez come on now!!! whe all know What happen in that fight.

[bigsmoothh]

these haters will never stop coming with the weakest ****.