majority of u idiots praising julio chavez probably never seen his fights..and are just amused by his record..anybody who knows boxing would know skill wise their was nothing special about this guy...de la hoya was way more complete fighter then chavez
majority of u idiots praising julio chavez probably never seen his fights..and are just amused by his record..anybody who knows boxing would know skill wise their was nothing special about this guy...de la hoya was way more complete fighter then chavez
majority of u idiots praising julio chavez probably never seen his fights..and are just amused by his record..anybody who knows boxing would know skill wise their was nothing special about this guy...de la hoya was way more complete fighter then chavez
anybody who knows boxing and has seen chavez fights, knows chavez was one of the GODS of infighthing. it takes an idiot not to notice that.
Chavez FOUGHT MANY bums in his turf to PAD his record. Look how many times he fought guys wit ZERO experience. It's crazy. and he got ALOT of gift decisions over his carreer gainst top opponents.
u dont have to infight with a guy ..u could jab and move like de la hoya did him..
sure when he was over the hill
u don't have to boxe from the outside with a guy, if you can pressure him and rip him. like chavez, frazier, castillo, duran, late marvin hagler, and many before and after.
this comment betrays your lack of boxing knowledge/experience. for your simple mind "skill = standing on your toes and countering". I hate to break it to you. but this is not the case.
infighting, bodypunching take skills and just like you learn them later in the gym, you start understanding them later on the screen
Chavez FOUGHT MANY bums in his turf to PAD his record. Look how many times he fought guys wit ZERO experience. It's crazy. and he got ALOT of gift decisions over his carreer gainst top opponents.
Gift decisions? The only one I can recall was Whitaker. Dont hate just because he's not filipino.
Come on man!! your would doing real good on your debate now your talking dumb ****. what were trying to ask is how old were you because you said you started watching chavez fight at his 50th fight and that happen around the late 80's. Point blank man your going by some articles that you read not fights you seen yourself.
Actually, I'm debating pertinent arguments to those who gives me pertinent arguments. But to those ******s like this one an jabs. All they'll ever get is trash, which is what they deserve.
The bottomline is this. When it comes to fighting elites, Chavez was a loser and loser big time. No offense meant but that's what he is. A loser to elite fighters.
Although personally, I'd rate Chavez higher than DUran as he's no quitter.
Comment