who did JULIO CHAVEZ beat that was any good?

[NAB]

chavez beat better fighters than floyd will???
that makes a hell of a lot of sense

Might not to you, but you can't see logic when thinking about Floyd.

Who is out there, that's 'great' - that Floyd will beat?

[Hendrix]

i never called jcc a bum. i think he is overrated. he is a great, but he isnt the best ever or anything close to it

lol, come on man of course he isnt the best ever. But hes the best to ever come out of Mexico as of right now.

[Easy-E]

Might not to you, but you can't see logic when thinking about Floyd.

Who is out there, that's 'great' - that Floyd will beat?

you dont know who will be considered an all time great until that persons career is over

[Easy-E]

lol, come on man of course he isnt the best ever. But hes the best to ever come out of Mexico as of right now.

i said he was overrated, becuase he didnt beat any all time greats. that was my argument

[wmute]

Laporte beat him, and everyone knows below Lightweight are weak divsions.

good lord, your ignorance/idiocy never ceases to amaze me. I hope I misunderstand what you are saying

all of the following won titles at 130 or less

WILLIE PEP
sandy saddler
pacquiao/barrera/morales/marquez
SALVADOR SANCHEZ
wilfredo gomez
alfonso zamora
alexis arguello
FLOYD MAYWEATHER JR
jc chavez
EDER JOFRE
ricardo lopez
AZUMAH NELSON
JIMMY WILDE
miguel canto
tony canzoneri
HENRY ARMSTRONG
eusebio pedrosa
pancho villa

[NAB]

you dont know who will be considered an all time great until that persons career is over

Good. Then I won't see you saying Floyd is great.

[Hendrix]

i said he was overrated, becuase he didnt beat any all time greats. that was my argument

The reason many like yourself dont see the top guys that Chavez beat as all times greats is because Chavez beat them black and blue. Chavez knocked the **** out of so many guys that were strong up and comers and couldnt go on any more once Chavez beat the crap out of all of them. Chavez beat every single top guy out there in his prime......nuff said.

[ferocity]

We are not hating dude. That's different from presenting arguments. Hating is when you call a person a chicken and yet you don't present arguments to back it up.

I don't hate Chavez but the fact is, he got his bloated record fighting bums. And we all know what we call a fighter who fights bums on a constant basis. A bum himself.

When it was high time to deliver against elites, he got beat. The rationale is really simple if you take a look at it. An elite beats other elites in convincing fashion. Not lose to them.

Might as well call Joe Louis bum, for fighting bums. Whats that trem they called his opponets "Bum of the month."

Every since Chavez win over Taylor people hate Chavez. And take a look at the Whitiker v. Chavez fight and count how many times Whitker hits Chavez low, over 20 times, yet Chavez didnt retaliate but once if any.

Chavez is an all-time great like it or not. He fought opponets that he didn't have to fight, but did so, so he can stay sharp. Unlike, the current fighters of today. Last I seen Mayweather fight, he looked like he is slipping or could be caused by not fighting enough.

You see fighters today are more lazier and more richers and see it as a huge risk to fight an unknown fighter who is hunger. Not Chavez, he wanted to stay sharp and fought unname fighters, but who were hungry to win and make a name for themselfs.

If you don't respect Chavez or what he's done in boxing, how can you respect any other fighter, with out desperately trying to point out some negative **** about him.

[dino]

castillo and corrales are better then everybody chavez beat...or fought for that matter other then tszyu de la hoya whitaker..in which he lost!

[Brelampago]

meldrick taylo,hector camacho would beat chico and castillo