Actually, I'm debating pertinent arguments to those who gives me pertinent arguments. But to those ******s like this one an jabs. All they'll ever get is trash, which is what they deserve.
The bottomline is this. When it comes to fighting elites, Chavez was a loser and loser big time. No offense meant but that's what he is. A loser to elite fighters.
Although personally, I'd rate Chavez higher than DUran as he's no quitter.
it suprises me how youve gotten this far in life being so ignorant.
I tought I finished this thread what the ****! If you aske the REAL boxing experts in the boxing game (not you fools WANNABES in here that just started watching boxing and depend on boxrec.) What they think of chavez in they will all say he's an all time great!
and for all you fools that act like you didnt read this and still trying to talk **** about chavez first give your comment on this then talk ****!!!!:I just want to make my last point on Chavez, for those that bought the last issue of the Rings magazine the one with ricky hatton on the cover it has all the polls for the P4P's from 1980 all the way to 2006 and chavez was rated # 8 in 1985 #9 in 1986, #2 in 1988&1989 and from 1990 until 1992 he was #1 p4p So that should answer all the questions.
Comment