The Greatness of Wladimir Klitschko

[M Bison]

Wlad lost to three bums. stop trying to rewrite history.

He only rematched one, and let big bro take care of the rest. That's how it went down.

But you got to give him respect for turning his career around for sure.

Were Max Schmelling, Michael Spinks, Hasim Rahman, Oliver McCall and Buster Douglas all bums aswell?

Buster Douglas - Barely had any meaningful fights
Max Schmelling - 10 losses
Ross Purity - 20 Losses
Oliver McCall - 14 Losses
All KOed Heavyweight legends...

The fact you're trying to call Lamon Brewster and Sanders bums makes me honestly believe that you probably would also consider Joe Frazier as one to.
Muhammad Ali is considered the best ever heavyweight to live and Joe Frazier is as Ali said a slow plodding heavyweight who is there to be hit, perfect match up for Ali...
How could he lose to Frazier?
So your little thought up idea must surely mean that you consider Joe a bum because how could the worlds best heavyweight lose to Frazier who got absolutely dominated by George Foreman and knocked ragged at times by non-punching small heavyweights?

Or is it only people from this era you consider as bums?

Typical LacedUp twists his own little ideas it doesn't matter if you expose him for the idiot he is he will just make a snide remark and give no evidence backing the claim.

[VG_Addict]

Were Max Schmelling, Michael Spinks, Hasim Rahman, Oliver McCall and Buster Douglas all bums aswell?

Buster Douglas - Barely had any meaningful fights
Max Schmelling - 10 losses
Ross Purity - 20 Losses
Oliver McCall - 14 Losses
All KOed Heavyweight legends...

The fact you're trying to call Lamon Brewster and Sanders bums makes me honestly believe that you probably would also consider Joe Frazier as one to.
Muhammad Ali is considered the best ever heavyweight to live and Joe Frazier is as Ali said a slow plodding heavyweight who is there to be hit, perfect match up for Ali...
How could he lose to Frazier?
So your little thought up idea must surely mean that you consider Joe a bum because how could the worlds best heavyweight lose to Frazier who got absolutely dominated by George Foreman and knocked ragged at times by non-punching small heavyweights?

Or is it only people from this era you consider as bums?

Typical LacedUp twists his own little ideas it doesn't matter if you expose him for the idiot he is he will just make a snide remark and give no evidence backing the claim.

You didn't answer my question on what Sanders, Purrity, and Brewster's best wins are other than Wlad.

Louis and Lewis both knocked out Schmeling and Rahman in the rematch. Wlad didn't avenge his loss to Sanders, and instead got his brother to fight him.

[M Bison]

You didn't answer my question on what Sanders, Purrity, and Brewster's best wins are other than Wlad.

Louis and Lewis both knocked out Schmeling and Rahman in the rematch. Wlad didn't avenge his loss to Sanders, and instead got his brother to fight him.

And who was Rahmans and Schmelings best victories over?

Wlad didn't need to avenge those losses what is the sense of fighting an opponent in a rematch if he lost to Vitali and then went over to South Africa and fought nobodies he wasn't wanting to carry on boxing hence the long gaps inbetween Corries boxing career after his loss to Vitali.

If Corrie stayed relevant in the division and the interest was there of the rematch without doubt the rematch would of likely happened but fact of the matter is he didn't and the same can apply to Ross Purrity no relevance to it and nothing to sell.
The same time his brother fought Corrie Sanders, Wladimir was having the harder fight with Lamon Brewster so I don't see how that translates into him picking and choosing his opponents if he did that he'd of surely wanted big brother Vitali to deal with Lamon instead of taking a rematch with him.

[Weltschmerz]

Wlad lost to three bums. stop trying to rewrite history.

He only rematched one, and let big bro take care of the rest. That's how it went down.

But you got to give him respect for turning his career around for sure.

Ali lost 5 times against limited opponents. Best loss Larry Holmes, when Ali was younger than the supreme machine Wlad still going absolutely strong. Ali already looked like a 80 year old man after brain haemorrhage when Holmes bummed him out.

[LacedUp]

sanders and brewster were bums? wow,,,they werent elite but they were solid world ranked fighters with big punches. no crime in getting caught by those guys

Of course they were! Not as in 'journeyman' bums, but as in terms of world level. Sanders was not considered anything but a walkover for Wlad, and though I haven't seen the odds - I'm willing to bet they were close to 4-1 or 5-1.

Sure, he had a decent punch when it came to fighting the level of opposition he was fighting, and he was decently quick - but he wasn't world level. He was never in the top 10 or anything like that.

Lamon Brewster? The guy who was outboxed by Clifford Etienne? Come on.

Ali lost 5 times against limited opponents. Best loss Larry Holmes, when Ali was younger than the supreme machine Wlad still going absolutely strong. Ali already looked like a 80 year old man after brain haemorrhage when Holmes bummed him out.

Dude it's clear as day you don't know anything about boxing, so just stop.

[Weltschmerz]

Dude it's clear as day you don't know anything about boxing, so just stop.

I know more about boxing than you could ever hope to.

[LacedUp]

Were Max Schmelling, Michael Spinks, Hasim Rahman, Oliver McCall and Buster Douglas all bums aswell?

Buster Douglas - Barely had any meaningful fights
Max Schmelling - 10 losses
Ross Purity - 20 Losses
Oliver McCall - 14 Losses
All KOed Heavyweight legends...

The fact you're trying to call Lamon Brewster and Sanders bums makes me honestly believe that you probably would also consider Joe Frazier as one to.
Muhammad Ali is considered the best ever heavyweight to live and Joe Frazier is as Ali said a slow plodding heavyweight who is there to be hit, perfect match up for Ali...
How could he lose to Frazier?
So your little thought up idea must surely mean that you consider Joe a bum because how could the worlds best heavyweight lose to Frazier who got absolutely dominated by George Foreman and knocked ragged at times by non-punching small heavyweights?

Or is it only people from this era you consider as bums?

Typical LacedUp twists his own little ideas it doesn't matter if you expose him for the idiot he is he will just make a snide remark and give no evidence backing the claim.

Deerrrrpp derprppity derp

[LacedUp]

I know more about boxing than you could ever hope to.

You know that's not the case and so does everyone else.

[Weltschmerz]

You know that's not the case and so does everyone else.

Not at all. Keep ridin' daveys ****.

[GeneralZod]

Max Schmeling was KOed by a man with 47 career losses and a 25% KO ratio, and another guy who was 0-0-1. He lost to another fighter with a record of 37-39. That was before he KOed Joe Louis.

Billy Conn, who some consider Joe Louis' best win, started at 135 (lightweight).

Tony Galento, who was fatter and shorter than Chris Arreola, had 20 losses. But he floored Joe Louis.

Ross Purrity doe