If boxing is about doing damage, Clottey should've won the Pacquaio fight?

[FlatLine]

lol come on man Pacquiao dominated that entire fight.. it was a shut out..

[ßringer]

Can I ban this guy for sheer ******ity?

[ßringer]

Once in a life talents don't get knocked out the way Manny did. Just sayin.

So Roy Jones Jr. wasn't a once in a lifetime talent then, right?

[jas]

Can I ban this guy for sheer ******ity?

He makes ATG threads . He may be a lil' hit and miss but he always manages to produce a gem every now and then

[Canelo Phresh]

You only bring up clottey if they say the reason pac won the 3rd marquez fight was because of facial damage. Beyond that its a dead horse.

[Canelo Phresh]

it's too bad Clottey is fighting JMW now, would love to see Clottey and Bradley go "head to head"

F***367;cking Napier! You have some great one liners in bad threads consistently.

[IronDanHamza]

ok, whatever you say................ Rockin'

In boxing a bloody nose, black eye, bloody lip, etc. are all looked at the same as in football when the participant gets grass stains on his uniform. It means nothing to the judges or the score of the contest.............. Rockin'

What's with the sarcasm?

Damage is not a scoring criteria and that's a fact. There are 4 scoring criteria and damage isn't one of them.

It might sway a judge, right or wrong.

The guy losing is likely to have more damage.

But, it's not a part of the scoring. The scoring is objective and has 4 criteria and again damage isn't one of them.

[Rockin']

What's with the sarcasm?

Damage is not a scoring criteria and that's a fact. There are 4 scoring criteria and damage isn't one of them.

It might sway a judge, right or wrong.

The guy losing is likely to have more damage.

But, it's not a part of the scoring. The scoring is objective and has 4 criteria and again damage isn't one of them.

Damage has nothing to do with bruises cuts and swelling. But damage does have everything to do with how the forces of each blow are excepted by the 2 combatants.

You're talking purely amateur boxing, I'm talking professional boxing. In amteurs a knock down scores only the blow landed, one click of the clicker. In the pros it's a two point round. Will I also need to refresh you of the 2 different scoring systems.......... Rockin'

[IronDanHamza]

Damage has nothing to do with bruises cuts and swelling. But damage does have everything to do with how the forces of each blow are excepted by the 2 combatants.

You're talking purely amateur boxing, I'm talking professional boxing. In amteurs a kd scores the blow landed, one click of the clicker. In the pros it's a two point round. Will I also need to refresh you of the 2 different scoring systems.......... Rockin'

That's not what I'm saying.

Where exactly are you getting lost?

Damage isn't a scoring criteria. That again is a fact.

If someone's face is bruised and the others isn't they don't get any extra points.

Obviously cleaner harder punches are part of the scoring criteria (clean affective punching) and they are likely to cause damage. But not always.

Landing clean hard punches that intend for damage, that's part of the criteria obviously. But damage itself is not.

Amateur boxing is completely different and nothing to do with anything I've been saying but just still being so condescending anyway.

[Rockin']

Obviously cleaner harder punches are part of the scoring criteria (clean affective punching) and they are likely to cause damage. But not always.

Landing clean hard punches that intend for damage, that's part of the criteria obviously. But damage itself is not.

Amateur boxing is completely different and nothing to do with anything I've been saying but just still being so condescending anyway.

Why must you be so sensitive?

Read my posts in this thread again. I've already stated what you just did............. Rockin'