If you defend Manny you are just a normal sane unbiased boxing fan, but its the ones who defend Floyd, they are illogical, irrrational, and victim players who are biased haters.
if you notice this if someone attacks Floyd they will randomly just attack someone who is loved and that is Pacquiao, they always have to create an enemy and point fingers to say what about this fight why dont you hate on him?
Floyd has no haters, only Pacquiao does and all the haters happen to be the ones who cry that Floyd has haters. A hater is someone who hates on someone who doesn't talk **** they are like bullies. Floyd talks trash and is arrogant so by nature he will get criticized, Pacman never talks crap and gives his all to the fans so anyone who attacks him calling him *****, pacroids, ducker is a hater.
Sorry its true.
Just like with whats happening with GGG right now, the racially driven biased floyd fans are hating on him now.
You owe me 2 minutes of my life back. Pay up buddy.
I totally understand . You don't need anyone describing you to yourself.
THIS! We can all have favorite fighters, but the second we are more of a fan of a fighter than the sport itself, something it wrong
Pretty much, I think genuine fans of boxing watch multiple divisions and fighters. If you're only watching one guy, or some fights that relate to that one guy, you're really a casual fan of the sport.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryXXX
Because they are that great,it is no deference between baseball,football,or basketball fans being so diehard the wrong word can start a damn fight. It is apart of being a diehard fan,what your favorite team,athlete does AFFECTS YOU DAY..if your team loses or your fighter loses you dont want to talk about it of hear about it...Any diehard sports fan can relate...you know so much about the people/team you support it is just like you are apart of the ride
That's cool and all Larry, but doesn't there come a time (or an age) where you get a bit beyond all that? The diehard fanboyism is really for teenagers.
Casual fans that attach themselves to the big names in the sport and then 'prove' their allegiance by blindly arguing about them being the GOAT.
That is pretty much the conclusion I have come up with. Fans of a fighter and not fans of boxing.
You probably not realizing but I found it funny that you wrote what you wrote and then I read this just below (ie. you have at the bottom of your posts):
so you are saying that it is okay to blindly defend Floyd or PAC? To be so blindly in man-love and latent-**** that you refuse to blame one for the fight not happening? So the mission is to prove to others (and yourself) that the other guy is to blame?
After spending all this energy defending pac/Floyd, does one get a moral victory out of proving the other guy is more to blame? Lol
Does this moral victory make you feel better since both fans (and Arum) screwed the fans? Oh wait, it was 100% floyd/Manny's fault. One guy deserves to be defended all the time for his actions and inactions.
so you are saying that it is okay to blindly defend Floyd or PAC? To be so blindly in man-love and latent-**** that you refuse to blame one for the fight not happening? So the mission is to prove to others (and yourself) that the other guy is to blame?
After spending all this energy defending pac/Floyd, does one get a moral victory out of proving the other guy is more to blame? Lol
Does this moral victory make ppl feel better since both fans (and Arum) screwed the fans?
Your educated response on this meaningful thread would be great.
Comment