Comments Thread For: Froch Not Happy Over Groves Demand For Neutral Officials
Collapse
-
Groves getting a little too big for his erm.....clogs.
The BBBoC ain't always great, but it's like a US fighter demanding the NYSAC oversees a fight in California.Comment
-
Champion Cry Baby
The only people that saw Froch win are crybaby Brits. To the rest of the world Groves was ripped off.
For such a tough and winning fighter Froch is one big ass cry baby.
STFU already. Get neutral officials and if you are such a bad ass go KO Groves. You say you did and you claim you will again. What a putz.Comment
-
You do realise that both Froch and groves are British, right. RIGHT??!!!The only people that saw Froch win are crybaby Brits. To the rest of the world Groves was ripped off.
For such a tough and winning fighter Froch is one big ass cry baby.
STFU already. Get neutral officials and if you are such a bad ass go KO Groves. You say you did and you claim you will again. What a putz.
LolzComment
-
British officials are the worst in the world
Groves is right
Every-time we watch a British boxing fight we wait for a typical British stoppage, its become a running gag
Only a wanker will deny thusComment
-
I don't think your analogy is correct, but I get what you mean and I agree.
Should it be: A US boxer fights in NY but demands that NYSAC not be involved.Comment
-
I think British refs are awful.... far too safety first.
However, British judges have nothing on American judges...Comment
-
Howard Foster is just a **** referee all round. It's nothing to do with whether he's "neutral" or not.Comment
-
Paranoid?
Forget the stoppage. Can anyone on here, even fans of Froch, make a case for how 2 of the judges had Groves just one round ahead at the end of the fight.Comment
Comment