Comments Thread For: Froch Not Happy Over Groves Demand For Neutral Officials
Collapse
-
Groves getting a little too big for his erm.....clogs.
The BBBoC ain't always great, but it's like a US fighter demanding the NYSAC oversees a fight in California.Comment
-
Champion Cry Baby
The only people that saw Froch win are crybaby Brits. To the rest of the world Groves was ripped off.
For such a tough and winning fighter Froch is one big ass cry baby.
STFU already. Get neutral officials and if you are such a bad ass go KO Groves. You say you did and you claim you will again. What a putz.Comment
-
The only people that saw Froch win are crybaby Brits. To the rest of the world Groves was ripped off.
For such a tough and winning fighter Froch is one big ass cry baby.
STFU already. Get neutral officials and if you are such a bad ass go KO Groves. You say you did and you claim you will again. What a putz.
LolzComment
-
British officials are the worst in the world
Groves is right
Every-time we watch a British boxing fight we wait for a typical British stoppage, its become a running gag
Only a wanker will deny thusComment
-
Should it be: A US boxer fights in NY but demands that NYSAC not be involved.Comment
-
However, British judges have nothing on American judges...Comment
-
Howard Foster is just a **** referee all round. It's nothing to do with whether he's "neutral" or not.Comment
-
Paranoid?
Forget the stoppage. Can anyone on here, even fans of Froch, make a case for how 2 of the judges had Groves just one round ahead at the end of the fight.Comment
Comment