Comments Thread For: Mayweather on His Place in History, Fighting Khan

[daggum]

When Cotto and Margarito were options, Floyd fought DLH and Hatton. Stop acting as if he turned down Plasterman and Cotto for Ortiz and Guerrero. As for Pac, if you choose to place all the blame on Floyd, that's on you. But both are to blame. As well as other political issues that are bigger than both.

margarito was #1 for years at that point and floyd fought sharmba mitchell and zab judah coming off a loss so cram it. then he went into retirement because cotto lived too far away.

[Boxing lives]

I wasn't talking about the Shobox card. I'm talking about how ya'll b1tch about Floyd's oppent but keep buying his fights.

As for his recent Shobox card. Don't know how new you are to this. But a subpar Shobox card is far from a new phenomanom that Floyd started.

this shobox card was one of the worst i've ever seen outside of the one where micky bey got ko'd by molina. oh that was another crappy mayweather card thats why. shobox is for young talented prospects like iman to get exposure. not no future mayweather scrubs to get tv time so fraud can profit. i'm not buying the fight. did somebody cum in your eye last time you were ****d in jail or wtf. learn to read you idiot

[hitking]

you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. it's great.

Oh I clearly know exactly what I'm talking about. What's great is your crush on Ward *****.

[Supreme75]

Its not stalking, its an observation. You wanna pull the "real fight fan" card. If you were a real fight fan, you'd post about more than Floyd. He's all you talk about, yet you have the nerve to call sombody a *****.

As for Pac, he's an example of somebody that b1tches like yourself claim was a take-on-all-comers warrior and clearly, he wasn't. Yet you see no fault with yo hypocrite ass.

So you're only a real fight fan if you post all fuc**ng day on forums?? I don't have that kind of time asswipe.

Second, when did I ever say that Pac has "taken on all comers?" Oh that's right, I didn't say that ****. The discussion was about Floyd and his opponents/legacy. You turned it into some Pact*rd/Flowmo ****.

Frankly, I don't believe Floyd and Pac are on the same level anymore. I'm objective enough to admit that, so don't try to pin me down on some diehard Pac fan type ****, fuc*boy.

[hitking]

margarito was #1 for years at that point and floyd fought sharmba mitchell and zab judah coming off a loss so cram it. then he went into retirement because cotto lived too far away.

#1 based on what? Was it losing to Daniel Santos? Or was it getting his ass kicked by an untested Paul Williams? I guess that paper belt he beat Antonio Diaz for made him #1. I'll give him credit though. He was #1 when he cheated and beat Cotto. But in true Margarito fashion, turned right around and got his ass kicked again by Mosley, who you b1tch about Floyd fighting. Which one is it?

BTW, Floyd did fight Zab coming off a loss. But he turned around in his next fight andfought the guy that beat Zab, whichj you also b1tch about.

[daggum]

Oh I clearly know exactly what I'm talking about. What's great is your crush on Ward *****.

well you just implied manny didn't fight corrales and castillo among many other people who were nowhere near pac's division or nowhere near relevance while pac was around so you don't know. you know everything about floyd's opponents and where they were ranked so you can make excuses for him but anything else related to boxing nope.

[hitking]

So you're only a real fight fan if you post all fuc**ng day on forums?? I don't have that kind of time asswipe.

Second, when did I ever say that Pac has "taken on all comers?" Oh that's right, I didn't say that ****. The discussion was about Floyd and his opponents/legacy. You turned it into some Pact*rd/Flowmo ****.

Frankly, I don't believe Floyd and Pac are on the same level anymore. I'm objective enough to admit that, so don't try to pin me down on some diehard Pac fan type ****, fuc*boy.

I don't think anybody posts all day everyday. But if you're a real fight fan, most subjects would interest you than Floyd b1tch.

[daggum]

#1 based on what? Was it losing to Daniel Santos? Or was it getting his ass kicked by an untested Paul Williams? I guess that paper belt he beat Antonio Diaz for made him #1. I'll give him credit though. He was #1 when he cheated and beat Cotto. But in true Margarito fashion, turned right around and got his ass kicked again by Mosley, who you b1tch about Floyd fighting. Which one is it?

BTW, Floyd did fight Zab coming off a loss. But he turned around in his next fight andfought the guy that beat Zab, whichj you also b1tch about.

well your timeline of events is seriously off but what do you expect. the facts aren't on your side so you are changing them. its strange how you loved spouting the rankings 5 minutes ago but then when i say margarito was #1 for 3 straight years while floyd fought mitchell and zab those same rankings don't mean a damn thing. make up your mind please.

[Supreme75]

I don't think anybody posts all day everyday. But if you're a real fight fan, most subjects would interest you than Floyd b1tch.

Yet you're still so interested in which subjects I post in? WTF is wrong with you??

How about you reply to my question, when did I say Pac fought "all comers", fuc*boy? You think just because someone doesn't like Floyd, oh they must think Pac's resume is better. Typical spoiled Floyd nutthugger

[hitking]

well you just implied manny didn't fight corrales and castillo among many other people who were nowhere near pac's division or nowhere near relevance while pac was around so you don't know. you know everything about floyd's opponents and where they were ranked so you can make excuses for him but anything else related to boxing nope.

Ahhh, I could have sworn Chico and Castillo had their epic fight in 2005, at lightweight. Wasn't Pac fighting at 130 in those days? I see, he had to concentrate on that epic trilogy with Morales when Erik was in the middle of a 1-5 streak. Or was he waiting on David Diaz to emerge at 35