he's been wrong about literally everything he said. obviously the facts are on our side so he can't win but its funny watching him try to spin and warp history. floyd had no chance to fight margarito! he could fit in unranked mitchell, judah coming off a loss, baldomir, hatton, and a long retirement, but sorry there was not enough time to fight margarito!
Comments Thread For: Mayweather on His Place in History, Fighting Khan
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Facts??? The FACT is, anybody would have fought DLH over Margarito. FACT, Hatton was undefeated and rated higher P4P than Margarito, who had lost to Williams. So I ask again, why should Floyd have fought Margarito over either of those guys.he's been wrong about literally everything he said. obviously the facts are on our side so he can't win but its funny watching him try to spin and warp history. floyd had no chance to fight margarito! he could fit in unranked mitchell, judah coming off a loss, baldomir, hatton, and a long retirement, but sorry there was not enough time to fight margarito!
BTW, I don't fight in lockup. For what???Comment
-
ranked by ring magazine. the same place that 5 minutes ago you were spouting off all your rankings while defending floyd.Ranked by who??? Zab was THE CHAMP. He lost to Baldomir. WtF did Margarito beat? Six Heads? He was always in rebuilding mode. Baldomir beat Zab for the lineal title. Margarito had a paper belt that he won vacant against Antonio Antonio Diaz. You can b1tch and moan and try and change history all you want. But Margarito kept losing, and that's why he was never given the fight. The only time when the fight was kinda a "must" fight was when he beat Cotto. But he tuirned around and lost his next fight. I know in Pacland, its noble to fight guys coming off loses. But here on planet Earth, fighting guys coming off wins is the thing to do. Think about it likme this. Floyd fought the winner of Mosley-Margarito. Maybe had Margarito not lost, he would have gotten his shot. His fault.
floyd fought zab coming off a loss to a bum so cram it with your whole coming off wins thing. margarito was #1 at welterweight for over 3 years while floyd was fighting mitchell and zab. you don't get ranked #1 if you keep losing. spinks, judah, baldomir, and floyd all refused to fight margarito. how do you become lineal champ if they don't fight you?
here's some facts for you. margarito beat 7 top 10 welters and undefeated sergio martinez. that's 8 good wins. mitchell beat 0 top 10 welters. zab beat 1. baldomir beat 2. hatton beat 1.Comment
-
what about margarito over mitchell? margarito over zab coming off a loss? margarito over baldomir? margarito over retirement? he had plenty of chances but you live in pretend land where you think sharmba mitchell is better than a #1 ranked margarito.Facts??? The FACT is, anybody would have fought DLH over Margarito. FACT, Hatton was undefeated and rated higher P4P than Margarito, who had lost to Williams. So I ask again, why should Floyd have fought Margarito over either of those guys.
BTW, I don't fight in lockup. For what???Comment
-
well diaz actually was the lineal champ since he beat santa cruz who beat casamayor. it's not a great win just like baldomir isn't a great win.also nate campbell wasn't #1 for 3 plus years and pac didn't spend 3 years fighting unranked guys and guys coming off losses instead of campbell. that's what floyd did at welter. pac had 1 fight at 135 and fought the lineal champ. campbell and casamayor were definitely viable options as well. if floyd only had 1 fight at 147 and fought baldomir then yea maybe that would be viable except he spent years there without fighting the #1 guys. pac didn't spend years at 135. another false equivalency fail.Last edited by daggum; 03-09-2014, 05:13 PM.Comment
-
OK, so let's use your logic. You **** on Floyd for taking a tune-up in Mitchell. When he wasn't even long outta the lightweight division. You **** on him for fighting Judah coming off a loss instead of margarito. Just for ****s and giggles you can have those. Then, you reference Ring magazine to validate your point. But you criticize Floyd for fighting The Ring magazine champion in Baldomir. You justify that by saying all the lineal champs refused to fight Margarito. Which is kinda funny considering that Paul Williams had to sue Margarito to get him to fight him. But anyway. After the Baldomir fight. Floyd gets the lotto ticket in DLH. Of course, on plane We Hate Floyd, Floyd should have fought Margarito instead. But either way, Margarito goes and fights Williams and loses. But you still criticize Gloyd for fighting Hatton, undefeated and top 5 P4P over Margarito, who was coming off a loss. WOWranked by ring magazine. the same place that 5 minutes ago you were spouting off all your rankings while defending floyd.
floyd fought zab coming off a loss to a bum so cram it with your whole coming off wins thing. margarito was #1 at welterweight for over 3 years while floyd was fighting mitchell and zab. you don't get ranked #1 if you keep losing. spinks, judah, baldomir, and floyd all refused to fight margarito. how do you become lineal champ if they don't fight you?
here's some facts for you. margarito beat 7 top 10 welters and undefeated sergio martinez. that's 8 good wins. mitchell beat 0 top 10 welters. zab beat 1. baldomir beat 2. hatton beat 1.Comment
-
or williams after the hatton fight since he beat margarito and wasn't affiliated with top rank. williams, margarito, cotto were all something in their primes. floyd chose retirement.Comment
-
exactly you dont fight in jail you willingly get ****d without putting up a fight queefqueen. your a ***ing joke you panzy ass douchebagFacts??? The FACT is, anybody would have fought DLH over Margarito. FACT, Hatton was undefeated and rated higher P4P than Margarito, who had lost to Williams. So I ask again, why should Floyd have fought Margarito over either of those guys.
BTW, I don't fight in lockup. For what???Comment
-
Comment
Comment