one big win doesn't make you an ATG...especially if you needed 4 tries and PEDs to do it
JMM is not an ATG
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I never understood this argument. Yeah it took Marquez 4 fights to get a decisive win yet in that same span Pacquiao has yet to beat Marquez decisively and he's going to need at least 5 fights to do it.Comment
-
Comment
-
Tarver is not a good comparison. He doesn't have much other than the Jones wins, while Marquez has many good wins beyond Pacquiao. And the Roy Jones Tarver beat was clearly past prime, whereas Marquez gave a prime Pacquiao fits. Also, Tarver's losses are less excusable. Marquez's losses came against the very best, and only one of them was decisive.A hall of famer yes,but not ann ATG
He most know forbhis close loses to an ATG
But is resume to me shows he was a great fighter
And hall of famer .
But not an ATG.
If he is an ATG so is tarver.
Tarver and JMM are in the same light.
Solid HoFers . Now know for finally beating the rivals
As they declined.
Tarver is not an ATG, but Marquez arguably (I say arguably, not definitely) is.Comment
-
just simple, aside from Pac, what names you can add on Marquez resume?Comment
-
Comment
-
because JMM doesn't have the names that are already on PAC's resume
i wouldn't call PAC an ATG either if his best wins, aside JMM, was an old ass Casamayor and shot to **** BarreraComment
-
-
Comment