Eubank: How I would've beaten a peak RJJ!

[coghaugen]

You can't be serious.

Yes in my opinion Benn was perfect for James.

[spsherm]

I love how everyone has a way to beat the ATG's when it's too late. Doesn't mean he doesn't make some good points, but it's totally different when a freak of nature is there in front of you.

[coghaugen]

Eubank was a freak of nature himself. That jaw, that body, that foot speed, those six-inch shots with breakneck power, mixed in with six-foot shots and body sways out of range. Both freaks!

[coghaugen]

Eubank also had probably the fastest double-jab I've seen

http://*************/watch?v=zA8lTi1Ea48

[Mr. Philadel]

Interesting stuff from Eubank....got me going hmmmmm

When dudes like Eubank talk....dudes like us should just listen...just saying!!

[richardt]

Here's me thinking it mattered WHO you beat and in what fashion that made you legit. But no, its all about what letters are before a title

It is about who beat who and the skills. Everyone is a contender next to a PFP champ.

[richardt]

Childish...

It's called facing the truth.

[blacraven]

Yeah......Yeah....yeah.
And I "would've" been a millionare if I "would've" hit the lottery.
The point is, if you did'nt do it, then shut the hell up.

[cameltoe]

You just made a ****** comment. You are taking one fighter's BEST moment against Eubank and comparing it to another fighters worst moment against Mercado!!!! Do you realize how ****** that is???? I guarantee you that an OVERWHELMING majority pick Jones, Hopkins, and Toney over Eubank, Watson, and Benn. Not even worthy of a debate.

You clearly haven't read the whole post and are just reacting angrily at the title. Eubank doesn't say he would have beaten RJJ, the opposite in fact, and just gives his opinions on the tactics he would have used if they had fought. Yet with each post you just give yourself away as someone who has never heard of Chris Eubank, Michael Watson or Nigel Benn, and have spent time in between posts frantically googling and youtubing to form a hashed together opinion.

All could have been avoided if you'd just read the post instead of d1ckriding RJJ.

[richardt]

You clearly haven't read the whole post and are just reacting angrily at the title. Eubank doesn't say he would have beaten RJJ, the opposite in fact, and just gives his opinions on the tactics he would have used if they had fought. Yet with each post you just give yourself away as someone who has never heard of Chris Eubank, Michael Watson or Nigel Benn, and have spent time in between posts frantically googling and youtubing to form a hashed together opinion. All could have been avoided if you'd just read the post instead of d1ckriding RJJ.

If you had a lick of understanding of context, you would know I wasn't responding to what Eubank said, I was responding to a post that used Mercado as Hopkins example, rather than using the top fights that these fighters had as examples. And not only have I heard of those fighters, I saw their fights. If someone is going to use examples, use the top names a fighter fought when he was in his prime, rather than having an agenda where a fighter after his prime is used to compare to a fighter in his prime. There is a reason Eubanks is not even on the list of fighters who are mentioned vs Jones, it is not a fantasy matchup because he is NOT in Jones' league, and would not be remotely favored to beat Jones, period if they had fought or in retrospective. Oh, and once again, you are incapable of reading comprehension. I DID NOT dismiss those fighters, I already said Eubank was in the top ATG's at 168 and Benn was not far behind. Learn to read.