Your logic is filled with holes. Cause that means we can discuss all the lessor fighters than Eubank who could beat him and I'm not and you sure as hell are not going to spend time talking about fighters who would not be seen as at Eubank's overall level beating him because of styles. Jones and Eubank never fought so here is the reality: A poll has already been taken and Jones won hands down in the poll. Game over. The majority has spoken, live with it.
Eubank: How I would've beaten a peak RJJ!
Collapse
-
Comment
-
At least now you agree that Jones would have beaten Eubank considering that you believe what Roy says means that you also believe Eubank when he said that Toney and Jones would be suicide for him. Glad you finally came to grips with everything. You can move on with your life now that you have heard it straight from Eubank.Comment
-
Jones is probably the most overrated (him or Tyson) fighter in history. He would have bet Eubank though not as easily a some say.Comment
-
Eubank landed a lot easier on the cute defenses of Malinga and Thornton than Jones did, opened them up like a can of worms and slipped in slick shots at will. Jones struggled with Malinga's posture, having to resort to lots of feints, and the 30-punch flurry he let off on an injured Thornton against the ropes had a 5-10% success rate. Granted Jones got in a single leaping hook to score KD's... His power and athleticism was insane (though Eubank had Malinga down more dramatically and Thornton hurt more on the ropes - both saved by the bell).Comment
-
Eubank struggled with weight and stamina more than punches. His ring generalship was impeccable though to go unbeaten in 43 fights with a such a low punch output.Comment
Comment