Comments Thread For: Arum Defends Bradley-Pacquiao II Undercard Lineup

[anonymous2.0]

Like I said, I think its a good undercard...just not a good PPV undercard.

[!! Shawn]

Bob Arum continues to defend the product put out as the supporting portion of the April 12 pay-per-view event, which is headlined by the welterweight title fight rematch between Timothy Bradley and Manny Pacquiao. From the moment the televised undercard was announced, the Hall of Fame promoter was the subject of swift criticism from media members and fans alike, through blogs and social media outlets.

[Click Here To Read More]

Say whatever you want Bobfather, after that rip off of a show that Pacquiao vs Rios was, I am never purchasing another one of your cards.

[twosweethooks]

I remember several GBP undercards that stunk.

Promoters really stick it to the paying public !!!

Arum is as devious as is Schaefer.

[El Angel]

At least he admits he doesn't give a fuck about the true fans. Sickening.

[Nightfall]

The undercard fighters are getting peanuts. This card is designed to help pacquiao pay his owed taxes

[ShoulderRoll]

I must be part of the 10% because to me this undercard sucks.

[KING MEAT]

if you cant excite anyone about the undercard, then somethings wrong.

floyd-canelo had a co-feature.

arum really does love robbing paying fans. GBP brings it.

[LouIE G]

This is a very good card,possibly the best supporting card for a pac ppv ive ever seen dating back to 2005...

[lets rumble]

top wank robbing the public and his fighters one again

[Jc8804]

I actually like the card.
Ray beltran beat burns down .

He is a solid fighter ,who earned to be in a bigger fight,
Martinez is always in a fun fight

The rest of the card is solid .
If your a real boxing fan ,you know the fighters fighting

Cant believe floyds ducking has gotten the world to choose networks.
If thats the case. How does it feel to know that showtime fighters and the network have to work twice as much to get the same result. Hbo has more viewers