Comments Thread For: Arum Defends Bradley-Pacquiao II Undercard Lineup

[LouIE G]

hmm. Not a particularly good undercard, but not terrible. Vargas-allakhverdiev is a legitimately interesting fight. Beltran-martinez should be good action. As for vazquez-felix, i wish it was uchiyama fighting felix instead of the guy uchiyama beat. But maybe the winner faces uchiyama. The most interesting of the three undercard fights is definitely the vargas fight, though i'll keep an eye on felix jr.

with everything you just stated in your post your pretty much saying this is a good undercard,while not saying it in those exact words...dont be scared of peopl trolling around here looking for people to leave red rep...its your opinion thats wut this forum is for..

[sapo13]

Undercards!!!

The Under card winner should be the guy that fights the winner of the main event in the next fight!!!

how boxing used to be!!!

[ColdBlooded]

with everything you just stated in your post your pretty much saying this is a good undercard,while not saying it in those exact words...dont be scared of peopl trolling around here looking for people to leave red rep...its your opinion thats wut this forum is for..

I wouldn't say it is good. I pointed out the positives. The negatives are that Martinez is coming off of a loss, these aren't top fighters fighting each other, and fighters like Felix and Vazquez aren't really proven. It's an ok undercard. But certainly not Pacquiao-Rios bad.

[TOBYLEE1]

This is a decent undercard but not PPV material. For those who say that the common fan don't care they usually ask me who is on the undercard. When you mention these guys they have no idea who are they. Arum doesn't support the event or Pac with a decent undercard. Some undercards fight steal the show and is something you need sometimes to get new fans.

[Cinci Champ]

What good is spending truckloads of money on expensive undercards when you have nothing left to fund regular fights? It sucks for the subscribers.

SHO is too much focused on Mayweather fights and the result is long layoffs for their fighters. Where is Matthysse, Garcia, Berto, Guerrero, etc.? HBO gave weekly fights at the end of last year and SHO couldn't match it.

huh that dont even make sense guerrero is in a battle to leave gbp garcia and mattyssee just fought garcia already has a fight lined up and whats berto got to do with anything? Is that really your reasoning for why u think its ok arum pockets the $ other promoters put into undercards?

[Cinci Champ]

lets call a spade a spade if your undercard looks like a friday night fights event then the promoter is pocketing the $ that would be used for a legit under card. funny arum easy to say 90% dont care when your keeping the $ for yourself

[Cinci Champ]

The Under card winner should be the guy that fights the winner of the main event in the next fight!!!

how boxing used to be!!!

its still that way they still use under cards to hype fighters look at canelo

[dc3383]

huh that dont even make sense guerrero is in a battle to leave gbp garcia and mattyssee just fought garcia already has a fight lined up and whats berto got to do with anything? Is that really your reasoning for why u think its ok arum pockets the $ other promoters put into undercards?

he copied and pasted that same lame a$$ post for the past 3 months

[-Kev-]

the only fight on the undercard that won't entertain is the vagas one,the rest will but I don't think it was the right choices to put on this ppv card

I actually feel that will be the best one, as far competitiveness goes.

[-Kev-]

The Under card winner should be the guy that fights the winner of the main event in the next fight!!!

how boxing used to be!!!

I think it's not out of the question to think the winner of Gambo-Garcia could jump up to a CW to fight Pacquiao at like 144-145 if Pacquiao can still make it. If that is the case then it is understandable that a fight of that magnitude can't be on an undercard. I really think if Pac beats Bradley his options are Marquez, Prov, and Garcia if he wins.