Comments Thread For: Arum Defends Bradley-Pacquiao II Undercard Lineup

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • soul_survivor
    LOL @ Ali-Holmes
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2013
    • 18949
    • 623
    • 473
    • 65,236

    #51
    Originally posted by TRTboy
    Those are good action fights. I don't get why everyone is *****ing. No big names or whatever but all very evenly matched fights that will surely provide some entertainment.

    Beltran-Martinez is going to be a war. khabib-Vargas is going to be a fan friendly fight. Don't really know the other two but like I said just because these guys are not household names does not mean they won't give us a good fight.
    Yeah I don't get why this card is getting pissed on so bad, there aren't any big names but these are all guys boxing fans know of and know how good they are. Beltran is good, Vargas, Khar...all good fights. I just don't get the useless hate.

    It's not as good as the One but that was a rarity plus showtime needed as many big fights as possible to sell that.

    Comment

    • jondacon
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 404
      • 21
      • 7
      • 13,864

      #52
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
      Bob Arum straight up tells you that he doesn't believe in putting on good undercards. But you're going to blame me?
      Somehow people will still find a way to defend this BS.


      Originally posted by DempseyRollin
      Isn't it crazy how ass backwards boxing fans think?
      Shyts cray cray.

      Originally posted by soul_survivor
      Yeah I don't get why this card is getting pissed on so bad, there aren't any big names but these are all guys boxing fans know of and know how good they are. Beltran is good, Vargas, Khar...all good fights. I just don't get the useless hate.

      It's not as good as the One but that was a rarity plus showtime needed as many big fights as possible to sell that.
      Its not even about the Card. Hell those fights could turn out to be good... its the fact that Arum admits to putting on crappy undercards because he assumes no one cares while obviously pocketing the money from the in house fights.

      Why would anyone defend this, much less even support TOP RANK after a statement like that?!

      Comment

      • DeadLikeMe
        ................
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2011
        • 11968
        • 748
        • 1,409
        • 26,662

        #53
        Originally posted by jondacon
        Somehow people will still find a way to defend this BS.




        Shyts cray cray.



        Its not even about the Card. Hell those fights could turn out to be good... its the fact that Arum admits to putting on crappy undercards because he assumes no one cares while obviously pocketing the money from the in house fights.

        Why would anyone defend this, much less even support TOP RANK after a statement like that?!
        Because to them they're defending Pacquiao's honor.

        Comment

        • soul_survivor
          LOL @ Ali-Holmes
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2013
          • 18949
          • 623
          • 473
          • 65,236

          #54
          Originally posted by jondacon
          Somehow people will still find a way to defend this BS.




          Shyts cray cray.



          Its not even about the Card. Hell those fights could turn out to be good... its the fact that Arum admits to putting on crappy undercards because he assumes no one cares while obviously pocketing the money from the in house fights.

          Why would anyone defend this, much less even support TOP RANK after a statement like that?!
          Oh, in no way am I defending Arum's statement, but in spite of what he's said, he has put on a good card. What should I complain about?

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP