Who has the better resume Tim Bradley or Miguel Cotton?

[JaYDeuce11]

I was gonna be so quick to say Bradley now just based on his wins of giving guys their first loss or loss in a while (officially not legit Pac). Hes fought Peterson who was prob on roids, Alexander when he was undefeated as well, Marquez after KOing Pac. Holt etc.

But that Sugar Shane Mosley fight Cotto won stands out cuz once again that was a Mosey like Pederson probably on Roids. Cotto then fought margarito with cment hands, pac n ay slightly in their prime too.

I just think bradleys 2 wins alone against marquez n pac (2 ATGs ) is undeniable. Yea he might robbed pac , but so did pac in marquez 3 so a win is a win

[Yaconcha]

you must be jokin me? is this a real question?
who are these total morons voting for bradley? idiots!

[Yaconcha]

a better poll would be between andre ward and bradley.
or sven otkke and bradley..lol

[mathed]

a better poll would be between andre ward and bradley.
or sven otkke and bradley..lol

Bradley is P4P #3, Otkke is nowhere to be found. Ward is P4P#2 (allegedly) so that comparison is more accurate.

Cotto lost most of his "major" fights and he punched Judah's balls off to win that fight. Cotto never turns down a challenge but he doesn't win them all.

[boliodogs]

I am in the minority but I did not even have to think about it. To me Bradley has a much better resume. I think Pacquiao clearly beat Bradley but he beat Cotto a hell of a lot worse. Margarito KOed him and there is absolutely no proof that his gloves were loaded, only hunches and su****ions. I thought Clottey beat him and he struggled way to hard with Mayorga. Then he had back to back one sided loses to Mayweather and Trout. Bradley's win over Marquez clearly puts him in front of Cotto to me. I know Cotto is very popular and I might get trashed for what I said here but I think it's the truth. Bradley is on almost every top 10 pound for pound list and Cotto is on almost nobody's top 10 pound for pound list. Why is that?

[Mike D]

Hard to say but ima roll wit

[Mr.Fantastic]

I still don't see how the hell Cotto has a better resume than Bradley. Maybe cause Floyd beat him and that's why the Floyd stans are voting for him along with the other group of blind fans(Cotto's flag legion).

[M Bison]

What a dumb comparison, Cotto hasn't needed questionable decisions to pull off wins unlike Bradley.

Cotto done it the hard way and hasn't had some like Bob Arum paying extra for judges to take a blind eye to things that happened... alia Manny Pacquiao fight and Ruslan Provdovnikov fight.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Never thought of this one but I'm leaning towards Bradley.

[A-Wolf]

Cotto's win over a primish Sugar Shane is better than anything Bradley's done.

Bradley didn't beat Pac.

Overall resume wise, Cotto gets the nod. I really don't know how to factor in losses though. That could be in Bradley's favor.

lmao GTFOH! Not even.