Who has the better resume Tim Bradley or Miguel Cotton?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #11
    Originally posted by bojangles1987
    Bradley's win against Marquez is as good as Cotto's Mosley win IMO.

    I don't think Cotto's losses matter much, because his wins are good enough where the losses don't enter the argument.
    It amazes me how beating a 40 year old Jmm is such a good win for Bradley when 4 years earlier a 36 year old Juan was a blown up featherweight, simply amazing

    Comment

    • mathed
      molṑn labé
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 54551
      • 2,743
      • 2,984
      • 224,675

      #12
      Cotto has the better opposition but Tim has the better wins.

      Comment

      • Ringlife
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2011
        • 5861
        • 64
        • 49
        • 12,524

        #13
        Cotto has the better resume between these two guys. The guy has fought everybody that I wanted to see him fight against.

        Comment

        • BUNGALOWS
          undisputed champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2013
          • 6331
          • 326
          • 154
          • 7,018

          #14
          Originally posted by bojangles1987
          Bradley's win against Marquez is as good as Cotto's Mosley win IMO.

          I don't think Cotto's losses matter much, because his wins are good enough where the losses don't enter the argument.
          That's a tough one to me. You could very well be right, and they're equal wins, but I give Cotto the edge, just because. I just personally think the Shane win was more impressive.

          And yeah, good point. His losses shouldn't weigh that heavily, because of his wins.

          Comment

          • -MEGA-
            THE DON
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2013
            • 10728
            • 2,087
            • 1,433
            • 422,560,632

            #15
            Originally posted by LarryXXX
            It amazes me how beating a 40 year old Jmm is such a good win for Bradley when 4 years earlier a 36 year old Juan was a blown up featherweight, simply amazing
            This isn't a Floyd thread here guy!
            Just sit back and enjoy people with a vested interest argue the topic!

            Comment

            • J The UnBiased
              Banned
              • Mar 2010
              • 2868
              • 136
              • 0
              • 3,099

              #16
              Originally posted by BUNGALOWS
              Cotto's win over a primish Sugar Shane is better than anything Bradley's done.

              Bradley didn't beat Pac.

              Overall resume wise, Cotto gets the nod. I really don't know how to factor in losses though. That could be in Bradley's favor.
              ******* is one hell of a drug

              Comment

              • RespekonMyName
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 2795
                • 240
                • 12
                • 24,643

                #17
                I'll take Cotton over Bradley AND Cotto.

                Comment

                • -MEGA-
                  THE DON
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2013
                  • 10728
                  • 2,087
                  • 1,433
                  • 422,560,632

                  #18
                  Originally posted by BUNGALOWS
                  That's a tough one to me. You could very well be right, and they're equal wins, but I give Cotto the edge, just because. I just personally think the Shane win was more impressive.

                  And yeah, good point. His losses shouldn't weigh that heavily, because of his wins.
                  The Mosley fight was what did it for me. If he didn't have that win I probably would have said even, or better

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Ringlife
                    Cotto has the better resume between these two guys. The guy has fought everybody that I wanted to see him fight against.
                    True he fought a lot of guys..but resume=wins

                    Comment

                    • BUNGALOWS
                      undisputed champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2013
                      • 6331
                      • 326
                      • 154
                      • 7,018

                      #20
                      Originally posted by J The UnBiased
                      ******* is one hell of a drug
                      I said "primish" not "prime", as in, beating Shane at that time was still a good win on your resume.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP