Who has the better resume Tim Bradley or Miguel Cotton?

[Spray_resistant]

You can't just look on a paper record and say oh win, lose, draw look and look at the name. Bradley in my mind is not credited with a win over Pac he lost, he looked terrible and easily could have lost the Provo fight, he beat JMM who was off of a good win so there and Peterson was an excellent win but the Devon fight was terrible both fighters did an awful job.........so Cotton wins easily no need for explanation.

[soul_survivor]

Miguel Cotto, wins over an almost prime Mosley, fought and almost beat Margy, Terrific night against Floyd, good 4 rounds against Pac, he beat a very good version of Judah too, fought Quintana and Malignaggi, stopped both and both were top, unbeaten guys at the time.

Bradley has the worst decision win in Pac, a very good win with JMM, tough war with Prov who may prove to be a very good fighter, but his run at 140 wasn't always the best. His biggest fight against Alexander was dud and he openly ducked Khan. The Peterson, Witter and Holt wins are good but they don't quite stack up to what Cotto has done.

Obviously if Bradley can beat Pacquiao without controversy, that will change a lot of things.

[Fighting_Pride]

cotto has the better fighting style and has more definite wins compared to bradley.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[DiegoFuego]

Bradley's win over Marquez is better than anything Cotto has done. Also, Bradley hasn't officially lost (even though he lost 10 rounds to Pacquiao). Cotto has lost every big fight he's been in except for Mosley.

[El Angel]

JMM was older the night he fought Bradley than Mosley was the night he fought Cotto.

[md3k]

Miguel Cotton

[Grimgash]

Bradley, he has a win on paper over Pac the rematch will tell more. He beat some top prime fighters. He also has a win over JMM. Cotto has SSM, though his losses do hurt him a bit. He didn't lose when he was old or over the hill. I give zero credit for who you fight, it's who you beat. Bradley officially got the win so he gets some credit though not total.

[$tate of Mind]

Miguel Cotto, wins over an almost prime Mosley, fought and almost beat Margy, Terrific night against Floyd, good 4 rounds against Pac, he beat a very good version of Judah too, fought Quintana and Malignaggi, stopped both and both were top, unbeaten guys at the time.

Bradley has the worst decision win in Pac, a very good win with JMM, tough war with Prov who may prove to be a very good fighter, but his run at 140 wasn't always the best. His biggest fight against Alexander was dud and he openly ducked Khan. The Peterson, Witter and Holt wins are good but they don't quite stack up to what Cotto has done.

Obviously if Bradley can beat Pacquiao without controversy, that will change a lot of things.

How do you give Cotto credit for loses against Floyd and Plasterito?

[Rome-By-Ko]

Very close,I'm going with Bradley tho..Wins over Pac and Marquez are better then wins over Mosley and a one eyed Marga's..Not to mention Bradley 140lb resume is better then Cotto as well..Bradley unified twice at the weight..While Cotto never unified at all..

Close but I'd go Bradley..

[Rome-By-Ko]

JMM was older the night he fought Bradley than Mosley was the night he fought Cotto.

Marquez had just KO'd Pac bro..Mosley was moving back down in weight and went the distance with Collazo..