lewis is a top 10 atg heavyweight
Collapse
-
-
I think this is a decent list:
10 - Sonny Liston or several potential others
9 - Jack Dempsey or Jack Johnson
8 - Mike Tyson or Evander Holyfield
7 - George Foreman
6 - Joe Frazier
5 - Larry Holmes
4 - Lennox Lewis
3 - Rocky Marciano
2 - Joe Louis
1 - Muhammad Ali
Haven't really mentioned Moore cos he could never make it at heavy.
Take away Tyson and Holy from Lewis' resume and your left with a who's who of c and b level sluggers.Comment
-
The boxing game has evolved yet, but you have to take into consideration what the fighter's standing was in his time, was he in his prime etc.
Taking those details into consideration, it is clear that Louis has better wins than Lewis.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
This.
The heavyweight division has been the elite crown ***el in world sport for the last 100 hundred years. Nowadays it's the laughing stock of the world. Very few general people in the world today would not be able to name the current heavyweight World Champions.
Abject champions fighting in the worst heavyweight era since boxing began.Comment
-
Top ten in terms of what? In terms of impact, character, resume, appeal? Because that's what most of the ATG lists seem to be...It's not about who would beat who in a BOXING match, its some other bull**** romantic criteria.
If the list is actually about who would win a fight, than most DEFINITELY(say it like Lewis) he is in the top 10.
I would say he would be a 65+% favorite to beat anyone outside anyone's top 3 list. And 50/50 against obvious top 3 guys, like for example, Ali/Foreman/Holmes?
But it's hopeless talking HW boxing on these boards when guys pick Louis and Marciano against a Klitschko or Dempsey against Lewis.
Come out of your nostalgia induced coma...It's a different age, it's the age of the superheavyweight and Marciano ain't got **** on a 6'6" 250+ modern athlete boxer, I got Deontay any day.
I have utmost respect for the old timers, but I'm sorry the sport evolves, just like any other sport.
That is not to say that ATG lists shouldn't be about "resume, appeal, impact"Last edited by Banderivets; 02-03-2014, 08:50 AM.Comment
-
Top ten in terms of what? In terms of impact, character, resume, appeal? Because that's what most of the ATG lists seem to be...It's not about who would beat who in a BOXING match, its some other bull**** romantic criteria.
If the list is actually about who would win a fight, than most DEFINITELY(say it like Lewis) he is in the top 10.
I would say he would be a 65+% favorite to beat anyone outside anyone's top 3 list. And 50/50 against obvious top 3 guys, like for example, Ali/Foreman/Holmes?
But it's hopeless talking HW boxing on these boards when guys pick Louis and Marciano against a Klitschko or Dempsey against Lewis.
Come out of your nostalgia induced coma...It's a different age, it's the age of the superheavyweight and Marciano ain't got **** on a 6'6" 250+ modern athlete boxer, I got Deontay any day.
I have utmost respect for the old timers, but I'm sorry the sport evolves, just like any other sport.
So it's really pointless talking about fiction and fantasy as opposed to who actually did what in which era.Comment
Comment