Is Roy Jones in the top 20 all time great?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingGenius27
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 8502
    • 370
    • 463
    • 9,603

    #401
    And even then lets not act like it was publicly demanded at the time roy fight collins, eubanks, benn or nunn because that wasnt the case

    In retrospect sure, those wouldve been descent wins, but lets not act like those wins would've been greater than the top wins he already had or like they wouldve miraculously changed some of these posters mind on his career in this thread

    Comment

    • Sugar Adam Ali
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 27630
      • 970
      • 1,174
      • 82,827

      #402
      Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
      And even then lets not act like it was publicly demanded at the time roy fight collins, eubanks, benn or nunn because that wasnt the case

      In retrospect sure, those wouldve been descent wins, but lets not act like those wins would've been greater than the top wins he already had or like they wouldve miraculously changed some of these posters mind on his career in this thread
      What about McClellan and liles and michlewski, especially g-man and liles...

      Wins over those guys much better than Lucas, Brannon etc...

      I would give Roy all the credit in the world cuz he would have fought most of the big fights,,, I highly doubt if Roy didn't fight Byrd or Paz or Brannon that we would be saying 20 years later, "man I wish Roy fought Lucas, or Paz". GTFO. No one would saying that

      Comment

      • New England
        Strong champion.
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 37514
        • 1,927
        • 1,486
        • 97,173

        #403
        Originally posted by THE REED™
        Poll results are shocking to me...

        the poll is extremely misleading. it doesn't ask the same question that is asked in his thread title.


        roy jones is one of the top 100 fighter of all time, which is generally the standard by which ATG are held. he's not one of the top 20 of all time.

        Comment

        • jas
          Voice of Reason
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 22542
          • 937
          • 914
          • 1,059,614

          #404
          so if someone thinks roy jones is number 30 he cant vote?

          what does "not even close" mean? does that mean not even in the top 50?

          garbage poll options for that reason.

          Comment

          • LacedUp
            Still Smokin'
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 29171
            • 781
            • 381
            • 132,163

            #405
            Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
            Do u want to address my quote about the UK or no?

            While we're at it, am i wrong? My guess is ur early to mid 20`s, no?

            Again, we're adults on here and as a man, i apologized if i hurt ur feelings or insulted u, now if u cant get past that then tough luck cause im not gonna kiss ur ass n beg for forgiveness. ... get over it
            I just turned 30, but thank you. How old are you?
            You didn't hurt my feelings, I just found it funny that you would assume something like that based on me disagreeing with you.

            Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
            @ laced

            N to answer ur question, off the top of my head, yes McCallum beat Collins
            Did Steve Collins not do his best work after that defeat?

            Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
            Fyi, ive been insulted countless times on here and have never received one apology...

            Even though i really would like to know ur age n thats not an insult i still apologized yet u still want to complain?
            Not my problem. couldn't care less if you dish out insults, it just doesn't make you seem more credible as a poster.

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #406
              Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
              And even then lets not act like it was publicly demanded at the time roy fight collins, eubanks, benn or nunn because that wasnt the case

              In retrospect sure, those wouldve been descent wins, but lets not act like those wins would've been greater than the top wins he already had or like they wouldve miraculously changed some of these posters mind on his career in this thread
              There was a good few people talking about Benn at the time, no?

              Politics prevented it from happening if i'm not mistaken.

              Comment

              • NChristo
                The Keed
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 5606
                • 369
                • 149
                • 18,296

                #407
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                Hey, go back and check the post that say's Micheal Spinks was a bum with no skill.

                I bet you've got something to say about that

                Quite a few pages back now.
                Aw Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuccccccckkkkkk that, said Spinks has always been a bum to him then posts a video of Spinks beating Qawi more convincingly then Evander "The Real ****ing Deal" Holyfield, just silly, surprised to see it from !!Shawn though.

                Comment

                • !! Shawn
                  !! Shown
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 9810
                  • 670
                  • 724
                  • 31,455

                  #408
                  Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
                  IronDan you a smart guy, you have to be able to tell the difference between mccallum fight and roy fight,,, Toney was an oddball, and could shine or shot himself in the foot,,,

                  He stayed really active in 91, 92 when fighting mccallum,,, jackie his manager said toney needed to fight 6-10 times a year to stay in shape and keep him active and not give him any breaks, but by 94 he was established star, he was still active but only fight 4 or 5 times a year, and that was just too much free time for james, and he would balloon like crazy

                  Regardless if toney was peak or not,,, that one win does not put roy in top 20 ATG
                  Yes, the difference is the man infront of him.

                  Comment

                  • !! Shawn
                    !! Shown
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 9810
                    • 670
                    • 724
                    • 31,455

                    #409
                    Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
                    No its not an excuse,,, Just how i feel from all the reports i have heard about that fight,,,,
                    Just watch the fight,,, he looked flat and only about 3 times in the mid rounds did he show any type of spring in his legs,,,

                    And i have said repeatedly that jones would probably beat him everytime vs any version of toney, just like how i think roy would beat hopkins at anytime, thats why i have roy much higher in terms of ATG, he just isnt top 20 for me
                    Compare his fight with Roy to a fight where he was clearly out of shape like his fight with Tiberi and tell me that Toney was out of shape and unprepared for Roy.

                    Comment

                    • Poet682006
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 17924
                      • 1,181
                      • 1,350
                      • 26,849

                      #410
                      Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
                      And even then lets not act like it was publicly demanded at the time roy fight collins, eubanks, benn or nunn because that wasnt the case

                      In retrospect sure, those wouldve been descent wins, but lets not act like those wins would've been greater than the top wins he already had or like they wouldve miraculously changed some of these posters mind on his career in this thread
                      If Roy had beaten in-prime versions of those guys I, for one, would be giving his resume serious consideration for top-20. Maybe it wouldn't push him over the edge for me but I'd certainly do some hard thinking on it and consider it a tough call.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP