Rank your list of credible threats to Floyd Mayweather

[-DSG-]

no offense but that list is soft

If we talk about risk then this is the list

Pacqiao
Khan
Lara
Bradley

Khan? Gtfoh

[Pez]

"Cold War" aside. Otherwise, I'd only have 2 spots.

1. Lara: The only one I give a real chance to beat Floyd.
2. Bradley: I don't think he beats Floyd but he is the most deserving fighter for this fight.
3. Pacquiao: The money fight. Nothing more than that. Many uneducated fans will be shocked that this will turn out lopsided.
4. Garcia: Another deserving fighter but the easiest opponent out of all 4.

[shade darkar]

They're the top guys in his division other than Garica he's the Top guy a division lower who's likely to move up soon.

I can't see how that's not credible.

they may well be the top guys in his division, but that doesnt add uo to a competitive fight does it? look at the klitschkos.

[IronDanHamza]

they may well be the top guys in his division, but that doesnt add uo to a competitive fight does it? look at the klitschkos.

So you're criticizing Mayweather and Klitschko for being too good? I don't think that's very fair.

As long as both of them fight the best fighters in their division then that's pretty credible if you ask me.

[shade darkar]

So you're criticizing Mayweather and Klitschko for being too good? I don't think that's very fair.

As long as both of them fight the best fighters in their division then that's pretty credible if you ask me.

well as a fan, who wants to watch a mismatch? why fight guys you are far superior to? why not move on to the next challenge?

mayweather vs guerrero isnt credible if you ask me. mayweather vs ortiz isnt credible. mayweather vs khan isnt credible.

klitschko vs Pianeta isnt credible, mormeck etc etc

[UTEP]

gennadyvich golovkin @ 160
matthysse's father
one time thurman
tim bradley's forehead
lara @ 154.

Great choice! None of that catchweight bullshit!

[IronDanHamza]

well as a fan, who wants to watch a mismatch? why fight guys you are far superior to? why not move on to the next challenge?

mayweather vs guerrero isnt credible if you ask me. mayweather vs ortiz isnt credible. mayweather vs khan isnt credible.

klitschko vs Pianeta isnt credible, mormeck etc etc

Were Mormeck and Pianeta the top guys in the division? No.

Is Khan? No.

These aren't credible fights.

Was Povetkin? Was Haye? Was Chagaev? Yes.

Is Pulev? Is Fury? Is Stiverne? Yes.

Is Maidana? Is Thurman? Is Bradley? Yes.

These are credible fights.

Just because Klitschko and Mayweather are seemingly vastly superior to everyone in their division doesn't mean it's not credible for them to fight the best and top guys in their division.

That's just ridiculous and simply just unfair. Anyone else can fight these guys at either WW or HW and they're credible but because the Champions are so good they aren't credible?

[Southpaw King]

Why do people like Bradley?? I feel he's a garbage fighter....beat Alexander with a head but, Pacquiao tore his ass up, provodnikov beat his brains out ( I feel he lost that fight) and the Marquez fight ******! What is so special about him? No speed, no power, next to no defense

[J The UnBiased]

Were Mormeck and Pianeta the top guys in the division? No.

Is Khan? No.

These aren't credible fights.

Was Povetkin? Was Haye? Was Chagaev? Yes.

Is Pulev? Is Fury? Is Stiverne? Yes.

Is Maidana? Is Thurman? Is Bradley? Yes.

These are credible fights.

Just because Klitschko and Mayweather are seemingly vastly superior to everyone in their division doesn't mean it's not credible for them to fight the best and top guys in their division.

That's just ridiculous and simply just unfair. Anyone else can fight these guys at either WW or HW and they're credible but because the Champions are so good they aren't credible?

you're not gonna get an answer out of that clown

[Tay Roc]

1) IRS
2) Josie
3) Sportsbook