I didn't say it wasn't dip**** but this is a fan poll and fans opinions don't need to count outside factors in the same way the media will
Dummy,how many people have said something about the Mayweather PPV numbers??Plenty cause it matters fuicck head..It matter's into Mayweather overall yr..Not just what he did in the ring,but his overall business as a fighter..People continue to lose site that this is a business..While these guy's are fighters,they are also business man..Mayweather had the best yr of his career this yr in these terms..They will be taking into account,by fans by really anyone that has a vote..As they should be,it's a major accomplishment within the sport(making it a business d1ck face)..
Losing clearly to FMJ, and his best (close) win in Trout losing clearly to Lara. It puts the jury out on Alvarez and at very least it certainly weakens his case for being the next best in the division at this year's end.
What about Tavouris Cloud's "best wins Glen Johsnons" subsequent fights? Why weren't they listed in your objective breakdown?
He went 1-4 in his next 5 fights.
That was also a (close) victory you conveniently forgot to bracket.
Dawson and Cloud are not better wins then Marquez(a HOF)and Prov a monster..Garcia win over the boogyman was also a better win then Stevenson's win over Dawson..Dawson was never really highly rated for me..Mayweather also fought and beat a fighter everyone wanted him to fight,and broke PPV record..Nah man,Bradley Mayweather and garcia are the guy's for me..
Let's take a look at the post again shall we..I compare their two best wins of the yr,while Stevenson's more impressive victory..Bradley had the more impressive opponents..Marquez over Dawson and Prov over Cloud's and Bullew..Simple really..
I'd vote Bradley over Stevenson aswell myself but PPV numbers don't or atleast shouldn't have anything to do with it.
That said, that's the main reason Mayweather will get it.
I'd vote Bradley over Stevenson aswell myself but PPV numbers don't or atleast shouldn't have anything to do with it.
That said, that's the main reason Mayweather will get it.
I don't think PPV numbers or the fact that a fighter is nearing the end of their Career,or anything should alter who get's FOTY..Now let's be honest,we all know all of the above will alter who get's it..Weather they deserve it or not,which is my only point..These things will be taking into account,weather we like it or not..
This is the point though, FOTY is considered with the benefit of hindsight.
We don't say, "he was considered better at the time than he is today, therefore fighter X deserves more credit"
It's like Calzaghe's win over Lacy, or Froch's win over Bute. Both good fighters, but not quite what they were made to be. We don't stick with the original pre assessment when we now have a better view.
Boone is a journeyman.
It still creditworthy to get back in the ring with, and then knock out the guy who knocked you out prior. Again, this is just an added extra.
It doesn't have to be a reply to my post.
You talking about objectivity startled me.
It startled me even more so when in that very same post you make a list which is clearly full of bias.
Those smiley faces are a great thing. When I worked out how to use them it's a great way to emote, especially when people say things as ridiculous and contradictory as you did in your post.
Well I didn't mean to startle you, I can only apologise for that (<-- and here's one of those smilies you hold so dear).
Anyhow, the funniest thing is that it seems Maidana is going to win this poll.
I don't think PPV numbers or the fact that a fighter is nearing the end of their Career,or anything should alter who get's FOTY..Now let's be honest,we all know all of the above will alter who get's it..Weather they deserve it or not,which is my only point..These things will be taking into account,weather we like it or not..
This is the point though, FOTY is considered with the benefit of hindsight.
We don't say, "he was considered better at the time than he is today, therefore fighter X deserves more credit"
It's like Calzaghe's win over Lacy, or Froch's win over Bute. Both good fighters, but not quite what they were made to be. We don't stick with the original pre assessment when we now have a better view.
Lacy and Bute are considered one of their best wins.
Fighters being a threat going in definitely plays has relevance especially if you yourself thought it. You can't change your mind after to suit your agenda.
Dawson and Cloud are not better wins then Marquez(a HOF)and Prov a monster..Garcia win over the boogyman was also a better win then Stevenson's win over Dawson..Dawson was never really highly rated for me..Mayweather also fought and beat a fighter everyone wanted him to fight,and broke PPV record..Nah man,Bradley Mayweather and garcia are the guy's for me..
Let's take a look at the post again shall we..I compare their two best wins of the yr,while Stevenson's more impressive victory..Bradley had the more impressive opponents..Marquez over Dawson and Prov over Cloud's and Bullew..Simple really..
I don't put Stevenson up there really. I took issue with you trying to say that Bradley's life and death struggle with Provodnikov was somehow more impressive than him KOing Dawson in 1 round.
Rigondeaux's win and performance against Donaire was the best of the year.
Comment