Comments Thread For: Froch Dropped Hard, Gets Questionable TKO of Groves

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MDPopescu
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2012
    • 24153
    • 1,504
    • 2,009
    • 4,138,611

    #141
    Originally posted by chrismart83
    Good fight, bad stoppage.

    To be honest, i think Froch would of stopped Groves in that round if the fight continued. But it should of continued..no way should it off been stopped at that point.

    Tough on Groves, he fought a great fight. I think he totally surprised Froch by taking the center of the ring and the knock down mentally knocked Froch for six...Groves was able to back him up.

    Froch showed a great chin again at times..did he just get old overnight though? It happens. Not so sure he will be overly-keen on an immediate rematch.

    As for Groves, he's a good fighter. I thought he would lose tonight...but i still thought he would go on to big things after the fight as he's a quality fighter. After tonight, my opinon is he's even better than i thought.
    He had a tough break tonight for sure.
    I don't think either... But, after this fight, it depends on how badly the media and the general public would turn against him...

    Comment

    • Skip Bayless
      Undisputed Champion
      • Sep 2012
      • 2091
      • 102
      • 146
      • 19,076

      #142
      ***in piece of **** ref and those ***** judges that had it close, groves was ***in him up. his speed, movement, jab, power was wasting him but the ***er went away from his gameplan. he got too ****y and started exchanging too much, feel like slapping him he had it in the bag

      Comment

      • joe strong
        Average Joe
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 17937
        • 1,804
        • 862
        • 58,015

        #143
        no rematch needed. froch was losing then he stepped it up & hurt groves gadly. 6 unanswered punches against the ropes with his hands down then the ref held him up frpm stumbling over. at the same time froch was stalking him going in for the kill. the ref got in the way. in my eyes it's not even suspect. the 2 judges scorecards were suspect but froch didn't let that happen.when people see the replay a few times some may change their tune...

        Comment

        • golden247
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Aug 2011
          • 259
          • 11
          • 13
          • 6,397

          #144
          Originally posted by chrismart83
          Good fight, bad stoppage.

          To be honest, i think Froch would of stopped Groves in that round if the fight continued. But it should of continued..no way should it off been stopped at that point.

          Tough on Groves, he fought a great fight. I think he totally surprised Froch by taking the center of the ring and the knock down mentally knocked Froch for six...Groves was able to back him up.

          Froch showed a great chin again at times..did he just get old overnight though? It happens. Not so sure he will be overly-keen on an immediate rematch.

          As for Groves, he's a good fighter. I thought he would lose tonight...but i still thought he would go on to big things after the fight as he's a quality fighter. After tonight, my opinon is he's even better than i thought.
          He had a tough break tonight for sure.
          I agree with most of what you said, however as Haye said how do we know Groves wouldn't have had as good a powers of recovery as Froch, know we won't know, we were robbed of this.

          Absolute DISGRACE by another BRITISH REF. Remeber the CHISORA against SCOTT MALIK among many others!!

          Comment

          • JJRod
            Unified Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 7675
            • 267
            • 326
            • 43,150

            #145
            If there is a rematch I think Froch will be smarter and fight a better fight.
            He didn't look like his typical self in there. His jab was weak, and it wasn't until the 6th round that I felt his punches were doing damage.

            I believe that early KD hurt Froch bad and he was never fully recovered from it. You could tell in the post fight interview he still wasn't fully recovered.
            Props to him though a lesser man would probably have not gotten up, and continue to take the massive punishment he took today.

            Comment

            • MDPopescu
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2012
              • 24153
              • 1,504
              • 2,009
              • 4,138,611

              #146
              Originally posted by HateBoxing
              ***in piece of **** ref and those ***** judges that had it close, groves was ***in him up. his speed, movement, jab, power was wasting him but the ***er went away from his gameplan. he got too ****y and started exchanging too much, feel like slapping him he had it in the bag
              Groves gradually lost his jab -- and that was costly.

              Comment

              • ShoulderRoll
                Join The Great Resist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 56169
                • 10,136
                • 5,032
                • 763,445

                #147
                Originally posted by joe strong
                no rematch needed.
                Are you serious?

                Groves hurt Froch far worse throughout the fight than Froch hurt him in my opinion. The difference is Froch was given a chance to come back from it.

                A rematch is absolutely the right thing to do.

                Comment

                • golden247
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 259
                  • 11
                  • 13
                  • 6,397

                  #148
                  Originally posted by joe strong
                  no rematch needed. froch was losing then he stepped it up & hurt groves gadly. 6 unanswered punches against the ropes with his hands down then the ref held him up frpm stumbling over. at the same time froch was stalking him going in for the kill. the ref got in the way. in my eyes it's not even suspect. the 2 judges scorecards were suspect but froch didn't let that happen.when people see the replay a few times some may change their tune...
                  Seen it a few times and COMPLETELY DISAGREE! He didn't even put him down!! Froch was hurt more in the first and subsequent rounds!! Carl's reputation allowed him the benefit of the doubt however as Groves' stated he is regarded as chinny for whatever reason and was stopped!!

                  Reminds me of the Lewis - Klitschko fight! But Groves was not as badly damaged with cuts and so forth.

                  ROBBERY!!

                  Comment

                  • sugarsmosley
                    sugarsmosley
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 7393
                    • 467
                    • 436
                    • 14,323

                    #149
                    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                    Are you serious?

                    Groves hurt Froch far worse throughout the fight than Froch hurt him in my opinion. The difference is Froch was given a chance to come back from it.

                    A rematch is absolutely the right thing to do.
                    COMPLETELY AGREE.... froch-groves 2 needs to happen!

                    Comment

                    • Pinoy4ever
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 1962
                      • 36
                      • 0
                      • 18,183

                      #150
                      Robbery fire that ref

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP