Tweet
Weebler you live in a delusional world mate, I know ur a Hatton stan though, I was rooting for Hatton to beat Floyd and I thought he had a shot but after that fight I realized Floyd was too damn good.
-
-
Your opinion doesn't make it a fact. You're hanging onto it like it was the sole factor in the course of the fight. Hatton still had time to throw punches, try something different and avoid getting beaten up but wouldn't or couldn't do it. Make it about the referee if it helps you accept the result but those without bias can see it for what it is. The better man winning and probably winning it at 140lbs. When Hatton was constantly holding (Urango) or splitting eyes (Smith), where was your corruption crusade?
It was about levels and Mayweather was always a level above Hatton.Comment
-
I didn't say it was the sole factor, just the key factor imo. I'm well aware an opinion isn't fact, that's why were having this discussion. We should probably leave it there though, we don't agree.
lol you're a fan, you argue his injuries are legit and that he'd beat Wladimir Klitschko. You're also a Mayweather fan which we both already know from previous discussions.
If Mayweather and Haye's shenanigans are your cup of tea that's fine, but don't pretend you're objective when you're biased as a corrupt ref!
Last edited by Weebler I; 11-20-2013, 06:23 AM.Comment
-
No I clearly made a post where I question his latest injury, I have my su****ions, which will only reveal itself on a later dateI didn't say it was the sole factor, just the key factor imo. I'm well aware an opinion isn't fact, that's why were having this discussion. We should probably leave it there though, we don't agree.
lol you're a fan, you argue his injuries are legit and that he'd beat Wladimir Klitschko. You're also a Mayweather fan which we both already know from previous discussions.
If Mayweather and Haye's shenanigans are your cup of tea that's fine, but don't pretend you're objective when you're biased as a corrupt ref!
Do I think he can beat Wlad? yes if he came with a different game plan and pressed the fight and also No if he doesn't press the fight and take risks. HW's can change the fight with one punch.
Hatton could never beat Floyd that's just fact, his style is all wrong and he cant adjust because of the way he fights. Does that make Hatton a bad fighter? NO, just is a testament to how good Floyd is, who in the past I have doubted over and over again only to be proven wrong. Its a biter pill to swallow, one day you will accept it like I finally did.
I only give a few fighters a chance at causing Floyd problems and even they don't really stand a chance at winning.Comment
-
the ref definately played a big part in the fight. i dont think it matters too much between 140 or 147 but for hatton to stand a fair chance he has to be allowed to fight his fight. its not like he throws his opponents around (klitchko) or uses his forearm alot (mayweather) he just likes to get close and stay close, similar to a mexican pressure fighter like rios. i think he had a decent chance 50/50 of beating mayweather with a fair ref. everyone knows you cant out box him so one way of beating flloyd is relentless agression and workrate which hatton had. i think with a fair ref that allowed hatton to keep close if would have been a closer fight and if it happened ten times 5/10 hatton wins, 5/10 mayweather wins.Comment
-
Sometimes I wonder if Weebler is Ricky or family. Let that go. Hatton is not beating Floyd at 140. Cortez or not, Hatton is not beating Floyd.Comment
-
People confuse "throwing punches" with "landing punches" when it comes to this fight.
And I'd love to see all these left hooks Hatton was "hurting" him with.Comment
-
Unfortunately for Hatton, who was definitely much better at 140, Mayweather was also better at 140 imo.
The fight may have lasted longer, maybe even the distance, but Mayweather is too fast (hand, foot, thinking), too accurate, too smart to be beaten by Hatton.Comment
Comment